Laserfiche WebLink
Prbdty 1 Custeniers: <br />• Existing Feat Step Project customers (dedicated landscape irrigation maters) <br />• Customers with agreaments in place for service <br />• Potential customers or groups of customers that have reFafl * large 3rigation or <br />Industrial demands, and are adtaoernt to potential transmi plW rkg Corridors' <br />Priority 2 Customers <br />• Pohwftl customers or groups of auskvm that taws snmltlo rrn d demands. <br />and are adjacent to or refattvely near potential tranamiasion pipailne corridors <br />Priority 3 Customers: <br />• Potential customers or groups of customers with roleiivafy smati demands, that are <br />either remote from potential transndsslon plpi ne corridors, or may have higher <br />customer site Iab oll coats <br />• Proposed future developments or ro4evalopment slice, or wdsft cusoomet sites that <br />are served by private wells or the Califomin Water gervke Company <br />Priority 4 Customers: <br />a landscaped sites that are not presently Irrigated or other uses that have very low <br />demands <br />a Sites that are very rerrots from potantial transmission pipeline corridors. require <br />significant additional pumping because of site elevation, or appear to have very <br />challenghVexpensive Customer site retrofit casts <br />Priority 1 and 2 customers represent the most viable CusCmers that are ready to be served, if <br />the City implements a mandatory use ordinance or obtains individual agreements for service. <br />The annual recycled water demand from Priortty 1 and 2 customers represents the most <br />reasonable minimum estimate of potential "new water supply' for integrated water supply <br />planning. Some portion of Priority 3 customer demands appear able to be cod offectire{y <br />served, however, service in many cases is dependent upon establishing ins"onal <br />agreements to replace a cement water supplier or f d re development or tsdevalopment <br />activities. Priority 4 custamers do not appearviable for a mrnber of reasons. Although they <br />were considered initially, their demands do not appear to be a source of *new water supply for <br />the City. <br />The potential recycled water demand for Priority 1. 2, and 3 customers in Redwood City <br />appears to range between about 1,100 and 3,172 acre feet per year (AF/yr), for a Redwood <br />Shores only project and a City -wide project, respectively. Within these ProjsCtkM about 582 <br />AF/yr Is for future developments or redevelopment projects t am in various stages of <br />planning. <br />S; <br />t <br />r <br />i Wafer Recycling Feast ily Study for Redwood Cky <br />