Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Implementation, determining a financing BMW. and in developing w initial rate and revere <br />plan. Refer to Figure ES-1 for a athematic plan of Altenatve D. The primary reason for <br />recanmernding Allernaflve D Is that It is the - roost boat+tfsdive p CJW corfoxation the <br />provides an adequate water supply (1.955 AF" to: <br />1. Reduce existing demands on the San Franeisoo Hetch lfetchy regional water system to <br />be within the City's contractual supply assurance. <br />2. Provide a so roe of fub a viater supply for poterdfa) new deveipprnents within the City. <br />Alternative D also provides slgnMosnt tie)dbft far thefak so the qty can oontinue to worn <br />the benefits of additional water conservation tneasums, overall water supply reliabatiy and <br />drought tolerance issues, widertransfers -and other water supply management options. ti the <br />City requires additional recycled water supply in the future, the plpalines provided under <br />Alternative D are oversized to allow the system to empand across Beyshoe Highway 101 into <br />Central Redwood City for a Ct� proect (3;172 AF/yr as in Alternative 8). The system <br />could also support anpansion Into adjacent communities to meet future needs If the qty were to <br />negotiate agreements for transmission of water from SBSA to other retail water suppliers. <br />Additional benefits and cons rations associated with nwornmending Alternative D are <br />included in Section 5 of this repot. <br />The total estimate of probable oap'stal cast, including facilities construction, service connections <br />and site retrofits, engineering, construction management, administration and a 2096 project <br />contingency Is approximately $38, 819, 000. The portion of finis cost associated with providing <br />oversized pipelines for future flexibility is approximately $4,891,000. Alternative D capital cods <br />are summarized in Table ES-1. <br />— 1. Water Recyrding FeaslbOW StuCy for Redwood My v1 <br />