Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~,I,C~2. <br /> <br />traffic over the Marine Parkway northbound diagonal on-ramp. The construction of this <br />bridge is the critical path activity, and will take us up to the end of the project. <br />Concurrent with the building of the bridge, the north and southbound off-ramps, which <br />involve surcharging to account for soil settlement, will also be completed. The project is <br />anticipated to be completed by the last quarter of 2005. <br /> <br />This project is being built in accordance to Caltrans Standards and Procedures. With <br />such Standards and Procedures, and with such a large project, cost control can be a <br />challenge at times. To date (approximately 216 days into the 400-day project), more <br />than 450 "Requests For Information" have been generated, and our Contract Change <br />Orders (CCO) number more than 110. <br /> <br />The majority of the CCO's were issued to cover details that the designers have no way <br />of covering in the Contract Documents, and to cover unforeseen conditions. PG&E was <br />not able to move their facilities out of the project area as first anticipated, therefore, a <br />significant number of CCO's were also issued to pay the Contractor to shift work around <br />in order to keep construction activities moving, and not have the project as a whole, <br />suffer too much schedule slip. Also due to shifting activities around, some quantities <br />were exceeded and CCO's had to be issued to cover the added quantities. A good <br />example of this is erosion control. The designer, who estimates the quantity, could not <br />have anticipated the Contractor to open up so much of the job site during the rainy <br />season, but because we have to shift activities around to accommodate PG&E utility <br />relocation, we were forced to do more erosion control. The total CCO for the reasons <br />stated thus far amount to approximately 9% of.the original bid price ($1.12 million). <br /> <br />There are three other major categories of CCO's that were issued to expedite the <br />project, and staff will pursue others to recover these funds: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />One CCO was a request by the City of Belmont, to increase the size of a <br />storm drainage system to accommodate their local needs. The City of <br />Belmont has agreed to pay for this change, which amounts to about 1 % <br />($96,788). <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Several CCO's have also been issued to the Contractor to compensate him <br />for errors in surveying and design. This amounts to another 1 % or about <br />$120,000. Staff will be pursuing collection of "Error and Omission Coverage" <br />from our consulting design engineer. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The third factor is the redesign of a portion of the bridge, which should reduce <br />project costs from 3% to 5%. This cannot be accounted into the contract yet, <br />since the Contractor has not signed off on this CCO, and will not likely sign <br />off until the end of the project. <br /> <br />The current figure of CCO stands at 10% of the bid price, which is the limit of <br />authorization granted to the City Manager, and staff recognizes that more CCO's will be <br />required to cover future unforeseen conditions. Even with the potential to recover as <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />