Laserfiche WebLink
. 9�l- �.� , . <br /> Legislative Biil Action <br /> ............................................................... <br /> New provisions added are similar to those in would threaten the construction of a transmission •� <br /> current law regarding mining resources. They line. Even if in five years CEC de-designates the <br /> would require a city or county to notify CEC of TCZ, the potential impact on the property owner <br /> proposed development projects that the jurisdiction could be profound, especially if the project is no <br /> "determines would threaten the potential to con- longer viable due to the lost time. <br /> struct a high-voftage electric transmission line." <br /> CEC would provide comment to the jurisdiction if The League understands the need to do <br /> CEC finds that the proposed development °would better long term transmission line planning. • <br /> threaten the potential to construct a high-voltage ... However, we believe that the process proposed <br /> line" and may recommend revisions to redesign or in SB 1059 continues to be flawed. Cities should <br /> mitigate the project that would eliminate or reduce send letters of opposition to their senators and <br /> the threat. The local govemment would be required members of the Senate Appropnations Commit- <br /> to consider these comments and if CEC objects to tee, where the bill will be heard next. Staff: <br /> the project, the local jurisdiction would be required Yvonne Hunter; Status: SenApps; Position: <br /> to provide a written response to address in detail Oppose Unless Amended. <br /> "why it did not accept the commission's comments <br /> and recommendations.° ACA 13 (Harman). Storm Water Fees. <br /> Proposition 218. ACA 13 has been amended <br /> Although the amendments are a small step in and now includes storm water fees! This admin- <br /> the right direction, the League continues to strenu- istration-sponsored measure would add flood <br /> ously oppose SB 1059 for several reasons. control and storm water fees to those types of <br /> fees that are exempt from the voter approval <br /> Most importantly, it would authorize the state requirement of Proposition 218. <br /> (i.e., CEC) to designate a TCZ. The city or county <br /> would be required to amend its general plan to be The measure is now strongly supported by <br /> consistent with the TCZ. CEC would periodically the League, CSAC and numerous local govern- <br /> review the TCZ plan and could de-designate a TCZ ments. If passed by the Legislature, ACA 13 <br /> — which would, of course, require another general would appear on the next statewide general <br /> plan amendment. election ballot. If passed by the voters, it would <br /> authorize cities and counties to adopt storm <br /> Besides preempting local land use authority, the water and flood control fees without voter ap- <br /> bill is silent on the width of a TCZ. Would it be 1000 proval. This is similar to fees that are already <br /> feet, one mile or three miles wide? Regard�ess, the exempt from the voter approval process of <br /> bill would tie up large swaths of land for five, 10, 20 Proposition 218 for sewer, water or refuse <br /> or more years until the transmission line planning collection services. The League continues to <br /> � process moves to the Public UtilRies Commission work with the author, the administration, and <br /> phase. In that time, property owners would have no storm water experts to fine tune the language of <br /> certainty about whether they could develop their the bill so that it appropriately references <br /> property or what the compatible uses could be. stormwater. <br /> Consider the plight of a property ownerthat, At this point, it is unclear in which statewide <br /> with the agreement of the local govemment, antici- general election ACA 13 would be included. The <br /> pates in three years beginning construction of 500 bill currently contemplate$ a November 2006 <br /> homes over a period of five years. If included within election. However, this could change if the <br /> a TCZ, future development options for that property governor calls a special election for 2005 and <br /> would be uncertain and could not proceed since it ACA 13 has passed both houses of the legisla- <br /> is likely CEC would determine that the homes ture in time to meet the election deadlines. <br /> PAGE 6/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official WebSite -- www.cacities.org <br />