My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-06-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-06-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2011 5:10:34 PM
Creation date
6/23/2011 5:06:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
6/27/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.13. - Page 1 <br />REPORT <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the Charter Ad Hoc Committee <br />June 27. 2011 <br />SUBJECT <br />Receive Recommendations from the Charter Ad Hoc Committee Regarding Proposed Charter <br />Amendments <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Provide Direction Regarding Proposed Charter Amendments <br />BACKGROUND <br />In California, a city is either a general law city or a charter city. A charter city is regulated by <br />state law in matters of statewide significance and acts under its charter authority with respect to <br />matters of local significance. There are approximately 120 charter cities in California. The <br />Charter of Redwood City was adopted by the voters in 1929 and it has been amended fifteen <br />times since then, most recently in 2009. Proposed amendments to the Charter must be placed <br />before the voters, and require a majority vote to proceed. Periodically, the Council directs its <br />Charter Ad Hoc Committee to review the Charter and determine if any changes or updates are <br />required. After a thorough review, the Ad Hoc Committee has concluded that the Charter is in <br />need of a substantial update. <br />The Charter lacks functionality in that the language is outdated, related sections are dispersed <br />throughout the document, some parts are superseded by state law, and other parts impair the <br />City's ability to protect appropriate development or disposition of its assets. For example, <br />Section 3 % of the Charter, which applies to property under the jurisdiction of the City Council <br />and also to property under the jurisdiction of the Port, inhibits the City's development of City <br />property by making the highest bid the sole factor for disposition of its property. It does not <br />allow the City to set development parameters to ensure that the property is developed in a <br />manner that best serves the community. The same procedure for selling property is also <br />required for leasing of property making it difficult to maximize revenue potential on City property <br />because of the cumbersome nature of the process. This section in particular impairs the City's <br />use of its property for the maximum benefit of the public. <br />Accordingly, the Charter Ad Hoc Committee makes the following recommendations: <br />1. Commence work with the City Attorney to accomplish an overall update and revision to <br />the Charter for consideration by the voters in November, 2013, and consider concurrent <br />re- organization of the Municipal Code to ensure consistency between these two <br />regulatory documents; and <br />2. Address the immediate limitations of Section 3 % and submit the proposed amendments <br />for voter approval in November, 2011. <br />A draft of the resolution revising Section 3 % is attached for review, and if satisfactory to the City <br />Council would be placed on the July 11, 2011, City Council agenda, subject to some revisions, <br />and placed before the voters at the November 8, 2011 election. <br />The revision would retain the existing section but limit its application to the Port and add a new <br />section that applies to City property under the jurisdiction of the City Council. Consideration of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.