My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-07-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-07-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2006 9:21:49 AM
Creation date
7/20/2006 1:07:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
7/24/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
474
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 6A <br /> Page 24 <br /> ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> Excerpts from Planning Commission Minutes 3/21/06 <br /> . entified with events significant in local, and regional history; and <br /> It embo distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of construction, <br /> and is a valu example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. <br /> Motion Passed <br /> Chair Seybert thanked the HRAC, McElroy and commented that this is a fine <br /> example of a neighborhood coming toget d getting something positive done. <br /> Mr. Jany thanked Gary Kelly for putting the presenta gether and Dimas Henriguez, <br /> a student volunteer who helped survey the district, for h <br /> 6. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT INITIATION <br /> 333 MAIN STREET - GP 2006.1 AND ZM 2006-01 <br /> Commissioner Claire excused himself from this Item due to conflict of interest. <br /> Senior Planner Ekas gave a power point presentation on the following: <br /> This particular property is located at 333 Main Street the developer is Matteson <br /> Companies. <br /> . Tonight - Planning Commission makes recommendation to City Council <br /> . City Council makes decision on initiation <br /> . Tonight's recommendation does not result in a decision <br /> . Initiation does not guarantee an amendment will be approved later through <br /> the planning Commission/City Council process <br /> If this were to go forward through initiation that the Planning Commission would come <br /> back and look at the proposed project and any other recommendations you would have <br /> for staff in terms of this particular site or project and/or a larger site area. It would <br /> include the appropriate types of environmental review as well as any kinds of economic <br /> or fiscal impact analysis that need to go with larger scale general plan and zoning map <br /> analysis. <br /> . 2.3 acre site <br /> . 100 units of ownership housing <br /> . four stories over podium parking <br /> . open space oriented to Redwood Creek <br /> . Traffic analysis <br /> . Not design review <br /> . Not site specific environmental review <br /> . Need to look at land use first <br /> 0 First stop - Planning Commission <br /> 0 Next stop - City Council <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br /> ~-,~- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.