AgdaPkt 2006-07-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7A Page 33 banks and soils. He stated that it is about time that somebody looks into maintaining the banks. Darryl Coo stated that the report was good; he is the first owner/occupant since 1975 and owns the house with all the boats. He has held international sailing competitions in his backyard with people coming from other airlines all over the world. He stated that his dock is in the Level 3 category but that he questions that because he is working on it. He is wondering if the boat that picks up the grass has hit his dock as he knows of two cases of docks being hit. He further stated that there are some dock failures not being addressed that are Redwood City parks such as at Dolphin Park and the park adjacent to the bridge. He asked for a bridge on Shen Boulevard and not cutting the lagoons in two as it impacts salling. Carole Wong, speaking as a waterfront owner, not an original owner, has a Level 1, non-conforming planter box header board. She commended the staff stating that\6ihatis takingsh.a.f'E'rl()Y,t ,she can see V'itlere ()YIJ'l(!f1t. l1avehad inpl1t, . ~kiflg Shape and having a result at the end. She strongly supports the policy as proposed and the enforcement of Level 3 versus Level 1. The hold harmless is no longer part of package but she does not understand the specifics about the encroachment permit. She stated that remediation of even Level 1'8 could be encouraged to bring back into compliance by waiving permit fees. Pete Hughes, stating he has a Level 1, does not have a boat dock but when seeking grandfathering, asked if he should put in an imaginary boat dock in the plans or building a boat dock right away. Lyon explained the easement question, the public hearing will address the fees issue, and stated that the intent of the policy going forward is to establish the process, document and record the existing condition for grandfathering, with a different process for future development Note: A "Petition Addendum" was submitted requesting that said petitioners be excluded from any "Hold Hannless" clause that may be incorporated into any new lagoon Guidelines. (A previous petition was submitted to the Planning Commission.) Council comments included that continuing communication would be important throughout this process. Recommendation: staff requests that the City Council review and comment on the Redwood Shores Lagoon Bank Policy & Construction Guidetines rpolicy") ,as recommended by the Planning Commission at their June 21, 2005 and September 20, 2005 meetings. Furthermore, staff requests consideration of the removal and/or modifIC8tion of existing improvements that have been classified with "Level 3" significance and recommends 1hat those properties that have been identified with "Level 1" REGULAR CllY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 13, 2006 MEETING MINUTES PAGE 6 MINUTE ORDER BOOK NO. 61 Page No. 107 -