My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-05-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-05-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:52:54 PM
Creation date
5/20/2004 4:23:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
5/24/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� A�� _ _ <br /> � using cutoff lights, shielding light to focus exterior light downward and automatic shut-off <br /> of perimeter lights (Mitigation 8-8). , <br /> Findings: Mitigation 8-8 is feasibie and would reduce the effects of <br /> liy�hting on wildlife, otherwise putentially environmentally sign�cant, to a level of <br /> insignificance. <br /> I. Introduction of Invasive Plants <br /> Potential Impact: The Project could introduce, through its landscaping, <br /> invasive, non-native plant species which would adversely impact native vegetation and <br /> special-status species which depend on native vegetation, particularly on adjacent <br /> Middle Bair Island (Impact 8-10). <br /> Mitigation: Invasive, non-native plant species should not be allowed in <br /> Project landscaping plans (Mitigation 8-10). <br /> Findings: Mitigation 8-10 is feasible and would reduce the ProjecYs effect <br /> on native vegetation and special status species which depend on that vegetation, <br /> othervvise potentially environmentally significant, to a level of insignificance. <br /> VI. HYDROLOGY AND WF�TER QUALITY <br /> A. Erosion and Sedimentation <br /> Potential Impact: Project filling, grading and removal of vegetation would <br /> disturb watershed lands and expose bare soil to erosion, with the potential for <br /> downstream sedimentation of marinas and Redwood Creek, particularly during Project <br /> construction (Impact 9-1). <br /> Mitigation: The Project would be required to obtain a National Pollution <br /> Discharge Elimination System permit, based among other things on a Stormwater <br /> Pollution Prevention Plan containing Best Management Practices, approved by the <br /> State Water Resources Quality Control Board. The Plan would control erosion control, <br /> stormwater treatment and other measures affecting water quality during and following <br /> construction (Mitigation 9-1). <br /> Findings: Obtaining the NPDES permit and implementation of the <br /> SWPPP and other permit requirements would reduce the potential watershed <br /> disturbance, erosion and sedimentation impacts, otherwise potentially environmentally <br /> significant, to a level of insignificance. If the permit is not obtained and implementation <br /> measures identified, the Project would not go forward. <br /> B. Increased Stormwater Contaminants <br /> Potential Impact: Project building and marina development and <br /> landscaping would increase stormwater contamination by heavy metals, oil and grease <br /> 1289102\179276.2 24 <br /> Atty/Reso/Reso.1470 <br /> 052004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.