Laserfiche WebLink
��� <br /> BUDGETf pagel ................................................ <br /> The passage of Proposition 57 lays a more Initiative on the November ballot. This mea- <br /> secure foundation for the 2004-05 state budget sure will require a vote of the people before any <br /> delib �rations. Budget negotiators can now put more local govemment re;<enue can be shifted for <br /> that p�Rion of the deficit financed with the "deficit state purposes. It also stop; any dart��ging <br /> bonds" rehind them, but producing a balanced budget action in the 2004-05 budget wh ,n the <br /> 2004-05 budget will still be a challenge. measure passes in November and requires any <br /> further locat govemment takeaways to be ap- <br /> As a reminder, the Proposition 57 bonds are proved by the voters. <br /> financed through a'/. cent reduction in the local <br /> Bradley-Bums sales, which is then reenacted at This explains why the LOCAL initiative is so <br /> the state level and dedicated to retiring the critical to the future economic heatth of cities, <br /> bonds. The sales tax loss at the local level is counties and speaal disVicts. Remember, iYs <br /> replaced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by property about money, but iYs also about RESPECT! We <br /> taxes shifted from schools to cities and counties. can lobby our legislators on the budget — and we <br /> plan to do so. We are again working closely with <br /> Now, the Budget our LOCAL partners (the Cal'rfomia State Associa- <br /> tion of Counties and the Califomia Special Dis- <br /> With the eiection behind us, city officials need tricts Association) on plans for a united Legislative <br /> to refocus on the Governor's budget proposals, Action Days in Sacramento, May 12 and 13. <br /> particularly the proposal to shift $1.3 biilion in city, <br /> county, special district and redevelopment But until we are successful in strengthening <br /> agency property taxes for state purposes. This the constitutional protections for local revenues, <br /> proposal is completely unacceptable and needs we know that legislators can and will take or <br /> to be opposed at every opportunity. (See "Why borrow local funds and shift new responsibilities to <br /> the League Opposes the Governor's Pro- local govemment without paying for them. <br /> posed ERAF Shift" for talking points.) <br /> ThaYs why we're urging all city o�cials to <br /> The politics of the 2004-05 budget process get involved NOW with this effort. To find out <br /> are going to be difficult for local govemments. how, please contact your League regional repre- <br /> The Republican caucuses in both houses will sentative. Sign up to give a few hours of your <br /> likely support most, if not all, of the Govemor's personal time to help coliect signatures on Super <br /> approach to resolving the budget deficft. After all, Signature Saturday, March 13. (See related <br /> he is their Govemor. There wili certainly be article.) <br /> enough Democrats to vote for the budget be- <br /> cause as long as money is being taken from Remember, city officials may not participate in <br /> local government this will help to protect other ballot measure advocacy using public funds. To <br /> programs of higher priority to those two cau- find out more, please review the "Legal Do's and <br /> cuses. Don'ts for City O�cials", posted on the Initiative <br /> page on the League's website (www.cacities.ora/ <br /> Finally, and the most obvious, the Govemor initiative . <br /> will likely stick with most of his proposals. This <br /> leaves few, if any, to defend local govemments. Be sure to visit the campaign website at <br /> www.orotectlocalservices.com, for fact sheets, <br /> LOCAL Initiative the Best Budget Strategy news clips, press releases and other background <br /> materials. <br /> Our post-election message is very clear: The <br /> most effective budget strategy for the 2004 <br /> 05 budget is the passage of the LOCAL <br /> PAGE 4/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit tl�e League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org <br />