Laserfiche WebLink
� l I <br /> �/ �� <br /> Legisla�ive Bill Action <br /> _ ............................................................... <br /> The following are summaries of just a few of the legislative bills that are currently being acted upon <br /> by the League of Cai'rf�vnia Cities. F.�r more infortnation about these and other .�ills, please visk <br /> the League website's i�ew "Issues and Advocacy" page (www.caciUes.orai <br /> issuesandadvoeacvl — a one-stop location to access infortnation about legislatio��, policy issues <br /> and reiated developments. You can track information on bills (www.cacities.org/IegVacking), <br /> locate legislators and legislative committees, send letters to legislators or the media through the <br /> online Advocacy Center, research League policy positions, access useful related links, and much <br /> more. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL Members about the importance of ACA 10. If your city <br /> is represented by a Republican Assembly Member, it <br /> ACA 10 (Harman). Storm Water Fees. Proposition is especialy impoRant fhat you re-enforce you� city's <br /> 218. Although ACA 10 has been on the Assembly support. It is important to remember that ACA 10 <br /> inactive file since mid-2003, city officials should be simply would place the issue before the voters. SWff: <br /> prepared to see an effort to move it ahead in the Yvonne Hunter, Status: Asm Inactive File; Position: <br /> Assembly within a few weeks. Support. <br /> A A 10 would include fees for stortn water manage- �� (Kehoe). Water Meters. Exisdng law <br /> ment programs to those exemptions already inGuded requires all new non-agricultural development buiR <br /> in Proposition 218. In doing so, it would make R easier after January 1, 1992 to include installation of water <br /> for cities to fund and wmply with new and increasingly meters. There is no requirement that water service <br /> stringent storm water qualiry pertnit requirements �arge to these developments be based upon <br /> adopted by the regional water quality control boards. �olumetric usage, although numerous cities do <br /> — If passed by the Legislature, it would be placed before charge for water based upon the amount used. Last <br /> the voters for approval. ACA '10 is sponsored by the Year AB 514 (Kehoe — Chapter 680, Statutes of <br /> Planning and Conservation League and supported by 2003) was enacted that requires jurisdictions that <br /> numerous local govemments. ►ecei�e water from the federal CenVal Valley Project <br /> to charge their customers based upon the actual <br /> Existing law, established by approvai of the voters of �olume of water used, as measured by a water meter. <br /> Proposition 218, requires local voter approval of <br /> certain property related fees. Proposition 218 ex- �(Kehoe) would apply to those cities and <br /> empts certain rypes of fees, such as those for water, speaal disUicts not already covered by either law or <br /> sewer and garbage, from the voter approval require- p��� �� �uld require those water providers to <br /> ment of Proposition 218. When the initiative that install water meters on pre-1992 customers and to <br /> became Proposition 218 was originally drafted, the charge all customers based upon volumetric usage. <br /> issue of storm water permit compliance and how to �t would require water providers to install water meters <br /> fund such programs was not as significant as it is on pre-1992 service connections on or before <br /> today. January 1, 2025. Starting January 1, 2010, it would <br /> require water providers to begi� charging all users <br /> Numerous cities have greppled with how to fund stortn �sed upon valume used. If water providers are not <br /> water programs in order to meet the requiremE,its of able to meet the deadlines included, the bill sets out <br /> new NPDES permits issued by regional water quality critena for various extensions of the deadlines. <br /> control boards. Some cities are faced with using <br /> scarce general fund monies to support these impor- Cities that do not already meter water and charge <br /> tant water qualiry programs in light of the restrictions based upon volume should review AB 2572 carefully <br /> placed upon them by Proposition 218. A 1 would and send their comments to the author and the <br /> help. League's Sacramento office. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, <br /> Status: AsWP&Wild (tentative); Position: Review <br /> , Cities should be sure they've alerted their Assembly and Comment. <br /> Visit the League's Official Web Site•-www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 7 <br />