AgdaPkt 2004-03-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

RWC: Nonconforming — Comparison Tables February 2, 2004 Page 4 TaBLE 3 NONCONFORMING PARKING COMPARISON OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS TO EXISTING Nonconfornung Existing Regulations Proposed Regulations Parking Nonresidential Unclear as to whether Change or expansion of use or nonconforming parking is a use or a enlargement of structure with structure; typically resolved by nonconforming parking requires Use requiring a Use Permit, but no Permit, finding that a) expansion will specific criteria exist. not occupy existing available parking area, b) no adverse parking impacts on neighboring properties will result, and c) parking standards are met for any increase in floor area or intensity. Multi-Family Not specifically addressed; would Expansion ofmulti-family residential Residential require Use Permit; policy is to use requires compliance with parking require compliance with parking standards for the entire project. standards for the entire project. Single-Family May be altered or enlarged, so long May be altered or enlarged, so long Residential w/ as: as addition will not occupy existing Inadequate a) located in R zones; available parking area and: Number of b) nonconforming only as to parking a) located in R zones; Parking Spaces requirements; b) nonconforming only as to parking c) no more than 3 bedrooms; and requirements; d) no more than 1,800 sq. ft. in total c) no more than 3 bedrooms; living area. d) no more than 2,000 sq. ft. in total living area; and e) existing dimensions for parking spaces and driveway width were legally established and access does not restrict use of spaces fl exceptions to 2,000 sf limit w/use permit; no increase in bedrooms; 200 sf maximum addition. Single-Family Not specifically addressed; would May be enlarged, so long as addition Residential require Use Permit. will not occupy existing available w/Adequate # parking area, and minimum of Spaces dimensions (above) are met.