My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-03-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-03-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:25:44 PM
Creation date
3/18/2004 11:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/22/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�A-1 <br /> REPOR T <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> March 22, 2004 <br /> Subject <br /> Recycled Water Community Task Force Report <br /> Recommendation <br /> Accept the Recycled Water Task Force Report, and direct City staff to return to City <br /> Council with implementation actions for consideration. <br /> Background <br /> On August 11, 2003, the City Council adopted a Memorandum setting forth the <br /> conceptual proposal for a Community Task Force on Recycled Water. <br /> The goal of the Recycled Water Task Force (the Task Force) is to identify 1,946 acre- <br /> feet per year of potable water demand reductions by 2010, in a financially feasible <br /> manner that avoids using recycled water at school yards, parks, and playgrounds. <br /> The Task Force has achieved this goal, and unanimously makes the recommendations <br /> as outlined in the Cxecutive Summary of the "Recycled Water Task Force Report". <br /> A copy of the Recycled Water Tank Force Report is available for review in Engineering <br /> & Construction Services and htto://www.redwoodcitv.ora/water/ <br /> Alternative <br /> Do not accept the recommendations. <br /> Fiscal Impacts <br /> The cost estimate of the Task Force recommendations are $14,000 more than <br /> Alternative "E", as approved by City Council in August 2003. Considering the margin <br /> of error in the estimated $43,600,000 Capital cost for Alternative "E", the cost <br /> difference is negligible. <br /> �� ���� <br /> Chu Chang Derby Davi son <br /> Supervising Civil Engineer Recycled WaterTask Force Member <br /> Mark McL ren <br /> Recycled Water Task Force Member <br /> JP/CHU'ss <br /> s/library/reports/chWRecycled Water Task Foroe RepoR � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.