My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-03-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-03-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:25:44 PM
Creation date
3/18/2004 11:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/22/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� City of Redwoud City Recycled W ater Task Force Report Marc6 3, 2004 <br /> 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> The goal of the Recycled Water Task Force ("Task Force") is to identify 1,946 acre-feet per year <br /> ("AF/I"') of potable water demand reductions by 201Q in a fir.3ncially feasible manner, that <br /> avoids using recycled water at schoolyards, pazks, and playgro.mds. The Task Force has <br /> achieved this goal and unanimously makes three recommendations tc the City of Redwood City <br /> ("City") City Council. <br /> First, the Task Force recommends that the City implement Altemative T'F, as summarized in <br /> Table 1 and Section 3.1. Through a combination of recycled water use, replacement of natural <br /> turf playing fields with synthetic turf; continued use of groundwater at Sequoia High School, and <br /> additional water conservation programs, Alternative TF achieves an estimated 2,002 AF/Y of <br /> potable water demand reductions at an estimated cost of $14,000 more than Altemative E. <br /> Considering the margin of error in the estimated $43,60Q000 capital cost for Altemative E, the <br /> cost difference between Alternatives E and TF is negligible. Therefore, the Task Force considers <br /> the costs of Altematives E and TF to be essentially the same. In addiuon, implementation of <br /> Altemative TF will allow increased utilization of the City's playing fields. <br /> ��M� : �i �3��j! � i � ���' "@4r � d �rW <br /> - � ; . ��'�.y t �� � , :.�! l� I� �,E' i k {54' W <br /> � � * p �,� � � ° ��r, ' �'�',��' � ; � ���� � `'��'� s ��p� � : <br /> 3 <br /> s., , �, °+ 7 t ._ �.! , r . att, : �. 3r:�u +#td .a� , <br /> Alternative E 1,946 43,600,000 22,405 <br /> Altemative T'F 2,002 43,614,000 21,785 <br /> Second, the Task Force recommends that the City investigate and/or implement Other Potential <br /> Measures ("OPMs") 1 through 10, which will likely resu(t in additional reductions in potable <br /> water demand. This recommendation is made to give the City additional flexibility to meet <br /> future potable water supply demands. The OPMs are listed below and detailed in Section 32. <br /> 1) Further Investigate Potential Use of Groundwater <br /> 2) Consider a Commercial Toilet Replacement Program <br /> 3) Promote Conservation <br /> 4) Adopt an Ordinance to Implement Conservation Measures <br /> 5) Consider Requiring Low-Flow Urinals in New Construction <br /> 6) Consider Requiring Conservation Devices in New Construction <br /> 7) Evaluate Incentives for Electronic Eye Faucets <br /> 8) Investigate Potential Water Swaps with Other Potable Water Conveyors <br /> 9) Evaluate Emerging Automated Landscape Irrigation Technology <br /> 10) Evaluate Emerging Treatment'Technology <br /> Third, the Task Force recommends that City staff prepare annual reports, for Ciry Council and <br /> public review, on their progress toward implementing the first two recommendations of the Task <br /> Force. <br /> Page 1 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.