Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> rD.A- <1 <br /> Legislative Bill Action <br /> ............................................................... <br /> bill not only usurps local zoning authority, it represents ation of additional territory that was not contained <br /> irrespon~ble planning, with r,) appreciation or under- in the local BgBncy's annexation proposal to the <br /> standing 0: location, traffic, Sitl conditions, or other local commission. Although this measure addressBs a <br /> Issues. concern arising from a proposed annBxation <br /> affecting the City of Simi Valley, it also represents <br /> Over 53 cities have sent letters of opposition to this good statewide policy. The annexation process <br /> legislation, and more are needed. City officials can help can be complicated and costty, and city annexation <br /> on this bill in the following ways: proposals are often the subject of much public <br /> Writing and calling their legislators. discussion and debate. The Commission's Bppro- <br /> Informing local resident organizations about the priate role is to consider the merits of a particular <br /> bill. proposal and make a decision based upon its <br /> Writing a letter to the editor of the local newspa- existing policies and state laws. It is not appropri- <br /> per to increase awareness. ate, however, for a commission to attempt to <br /> Having a conversation with their local Realtor's condition an annBxation upon the annexation of <br /> representative about some of the impacts of this legisla- additional territory that may not be politically or <br /> tion. economically possible for the city to accomplish. <br /> AB 2306 passed the Assembly Local Govemment <br /> Copies of the League's opposition letter, specific Committee on April 28" with a 9-{ vote, and moves <br /> comments on the amended language, sample letters, to the Assembly Floor. Staff: Dan Carrigg, <br /> and a list of cities opposed to the bill are available on the Status: Assembly Floor, Position: Support. <br /> League's website. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: Assem- <br /> bly Apps. Position: Oppose. M1Z2§ (laird). Mobile Home Parks: Rent <br /> Control. ~ authorizes the courts to award <br /> AB 2175 (Canciamilla) Condo Conversions: costs to local goyemments if mobilehome parK <br /> Local Ordinances: Defeated in Committee. owners or an association representing them bring <br /> Through the combined opposition of housing advocates an action challenging a local ordinance in bad faith <br /> and the League, and without reasonable cause. Under current <br /> AB 2175 which would have pre-empted local law, mobilehome parK owners and their associa- <br /> ordinances regulating condominium conversions, was tions stand to lose very little by challenging local <br /> defeated in the Assembly Housing Committee on April ordinances, even when that challenge is made in <br /> 28"'. This measure, sponsored by the California Asso- bad faith. The threat of litigation often forces local <br /> ciation of Realtors, was aimed at streamlining the ability governments to evaluate whether enacting a <br /> of apartment owners to convert their units to condDmini- cDntroversial ordinance like rent control is worth <br /> urns. The bill would have pre-empted over 232 local expending the significant amounts of money it <br /> governments which have existing condominium conver- takes to defend frivolous lawsuits. If a community <br /> sion ordinances. Local governments regulate condo- is forced to repeal a perfectly valid ordinance <br /> minium conversions to protect existing tenants and their because it does not have the financial resources to <br /> community's supply of rental housing. Make sure to defend it, residents seeking affordable housing are <br /> thank your legislator if they voted "No" or "Not Voting." ultimately the ones who suffer. The League <br /> (Committee Votes: No: Lowenthal, Mullin, Salinas, and supports ~ because it will alleviate some <br /> Steinberg; Ayes: Dutra, Mountjoy, Runner, and Cogdill; concern at the local level about litigation cost, <br /> Not Voting: Kehoe.) Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: because it will force mobilehome parK owners and <br /> Defeated in ASM Housing and Community Development their associations to face up to financial conse- <br /> Committee 4/28, Position: OPPOSE. quences when they file lawsuits in bad faith and <br /> without reasonable cause. Staff: Dan Carrigg, <br /> AB 2306 (Richman) Local Aoencv Formation. AB Status: ASM Judiciary Committee Hearing, May 5", <br /> 2306 prohibits a Local Agency Formation Commission Position: Support. <br /> (LAFCO) from imposing conditions on an annexing local <br /> agency that would require the submission of any annex- <br /> Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUSIPAGE 8 <br />