Laserfiche WebLink
�. i <br /> ( � , <br /> " ';_ ' ;' . ' <br /> , ; ,: _. <br /> . <br /> '������� <br /> _ ,� <br /> ;::;: >;., <br /> x � � �, �, <br /> �< � k z 3 <br /> _ _,.; .: ; <br /> _.. <br /> i , , , ,,: ,, <br /> a , �, <br /> ; �� ��i. ����b��i�' ����NB� <br /> Y <br /> c, <br /> ���� �����. <br /> �: : .� k .- :. C . j $y �� � �+� A '.F�i <br /> � ��iii <br /> � <br /> � <br /> .: :: . � .: ! . . � : j . . . <br /> � : <br /> July 26, 2004 <br /> Subject <br /> Final Acceptance - Fuel Tank Removal and Fuel Monitoring Improvements Project <br /> Recommendation <br /> Accept, by motion, the Fuel Tank Removal and Fuel Monitoring Improvements Project, <br /> and authorize the release of bonds and retention. <br /> Background <br /> On December 1, 2003, the City Council accepted the bids and awarded the contract to <br /> Technology, Engineering and Construction, Inc. (dba Accutite) of South San Francisco, <br /> California, for the Fuel Tank Removal and Fuel Monitoring Improvements Project, in the <br /> amount of $104,085.00. The project involved fueling stations at Fire Stations Nos. 9, <br /> 10, 11, 12, & 20, the Police Facility, and the Park Satellite yard at Redwood Shores. <br /> This project covers the removal of the fuel tank at Fire Station No. 10, thus reducing the <br /> number of fueling sites for the City's fleet from eight to seven, and leaving two <br /> remaining underground installations (Fire Station No. 9 and Police Facility). The <br /> installation at Fire Station No. 10 is outdated, and frequent testing of the tank is making <br /> the operation at this site impractical. The removal of this facility should not impact <br /> operations to any significant degree, and there is no plan to replace the facility. <br /> All the tanks and dispensers are now in compliance with new regulations by both the <br /> County and the Air District. The new monitoring system allows real time leak monitoring <br /> and leak notification from all sites, and will be done through e-mail for better reliability <br /> and faster response. This is a vast improvement from the daily manual report printing <br /> and fax polling of the old system, which also did not cover every site. <br /> A total of two Change Orders were issued during the construction of the project: <br /> Change Order #1 was issued to take care of unforeseen conditions, and Change Order <br /> #2 added scope required by the Regional Air Quality Management Board. Change <br /> Order #2 amounted to $7,450.00, and the requirement was not apparent at the time of <br /> design. This requirement came about only when the gasoline tank at the Police Facility <br /> failed a newly-implemented test. The repair triggered further improvement, mandated <br /> by the new requirement. This new requirement represents the added scope. Change <br /> Order #2 pushed the cost overage above the 10% customary threshold. The Change <br /> Orders total $15,933, which is 15.3% of the original bid price. <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />