Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> resources from the entire County. He stated that there is not much change <br /> although there is more emphasis on bicycles, pedestrian and shuttle service. He <br /> further stated that a letter had been sent to C/CAG suggesting that one idea might <br /> be to initiate a clearinghouse type process where any information on shuttle <br /> services could be pooled together. Although the residents in Redwood Shores <br /> appeared to like the service but because dealing with taxi companies that have <br /> certain financial problems the necessary insurance could not be obtained. <br /> Council comments included adding a comment in a letter to address revising the <br /> housing requirement to one half mile rather than one third mile distance to the <br /> transit hub. <br /> C. Hallmark Apartments Acquisition/Rehabilitation Project - CITY COUNCIL AND <br /> REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br /> Housing Coordinator Jones-Thomas explained the project and some revisions. <br /> The project is an existing apartment building being converted into affordable rents <br /> for the residents. The first change pertains to the number of units designated as <br /> HOME units which is changing from 90% affordable and 10% very low, to 30% <br /> very low and 70% at low income. She further stated that there is more benefit to <br /> the City if the $500,000.00 is used toward the acquisition as opposed to the <br /> rehabilitation. If the 13% is designated as HOME units it subjects the project to <br /> prevailing wages. <br /> Mark Hyatt, of KDF Communities, explained the proposed project, the experience <br /> in these types of projects and the financing that will be used. <br /> Council Members expressed concerns about the reduction in HOME units and the <br /> purpose of avoiding prevailing wage payments pointing to the recent policy <br /> approved for support of prevailing wages. <br /> Recess: 8:55 - 9:15 p.m. <br /> City Attorney Yamamoto referred to a policy adopted in 1988 by the <br /> Redevelopment Agency stating that it provides that the Agency desires that the <br /> prevailing wage policy be applied uniformly throughout the project area. The <br /> second policy referred to earlier was adopted on October 13. 2003 and is only a <br /> policy of the City Council. That policy speaks to the issue of City Council being in <br /> support of California State law requiring contractors and sub-contractors on public <br /> projects to pay construction workers wages at least equal to the wages prevailing <br /> in local labor markets. The conclusion being that there are actually two adopted <br /> policies reiterating support for the State prevailing wage law. <br /> Council comments ensued that included the fact that there is a possibility of <br /> providing 72 units of housing and that doing so with this project would not violate <br /> any policies of prevailing wage. <br /> SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND DECEMBER 15, 2003 <br /> REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MINUTES PAGE 4 <br />