My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-01-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-01-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2006 9:24:32 AM
Creation date
1/23/2004 8:35:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 1.A#3 <br /> Edward Everett <br /> January 22, 2004 <br /> Page 2 <br /> . Clay Lewis, R,'dwood Shores Owners Association <br /> . Rosanne Foust, then representing the Redwood Shores Community Association <br /> . Carol Ford, San Carlos Pilots' Association <br /> . Tom Huening, San Mateo COWlty <br /> . Ralph Nobles, Planning Commission <br /> In Washington, D.C., I presented the City's case on the Redwood Shores levee to Julie <br /> MacDonald, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Interior, Fish, Wildlife and Parks, fonnerly <br /> California Department of Resources Secretary. I also met with members of the <br /> Congressional delegations of both Representatives Tom Lantos and Anna Eshoo. <br /> During those meetings I gained an understanding of the needs of the citizens of Redwood <br /> City to restore a quality of life denied them by the strictures of the biological opinion and <br /> the levels of mistrust that had previously existed between certain members of the federal <br /> family, the City of Redwood City and regional members of the environmental community <br /> over this issue. Throughout my investigations, and in my conversations with each <br /> individual, I reiterated my desire, and the desire of my client Redwood City, to conserve <br /> the subject endangered species, preserve habitat in a responsible way, join with the <br /> Department of Interior in seeking improvements to the salt marsh habitat within its <br /> borders and become an active party in the stewardship obligations of all citizens in the <br /> ecological future of the San Francisco Bay. The overwhelming majority of my contacts <br /> with stakeholders were positive. Almost eveI)' one expressed their support. Those <br /> interest groups most interested with the species were Wlderstandably concerned with <br /> funding substantive habitat benefits. <br /> In order to return access to the people of the City of Redwood City, we could not focus <br /> on a limited habitat picture. We would have to recognize changed conditions since the <br /> biological opinion was issued, restore the faith of non-local government parties in the <br /> veracity and desire of the City to adopt, embrace and preserve the endangered species and <br /> habitat within its bOWldaries, and frod a common sense "pennanent" solution to the <br /> overall salt marsh habitat problems facing the City at Bird and Bair Islands. <br /> As a result of our meetings with FWS in Sacramento, we have developed a working <br /> protocol that, when reviewed by expert scientific analysis, will, I believe, result in both <br /> renewed access to the citizens of Redwood City and a higher degree of security for the <br /> endangered species because of the commitment to conservation and protection fostered <br /> by the City. We must be careful to acknowledge that Wltil we have completely satisfied <br /> the FWS, no commitment on their part should be suggested or solicited. The question <br /> 141603.000 IIDA040 160.064 J 01/22/04 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.