My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-01-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-01-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2006 9:24:32 AM
Creation date
1/23/2004 8:35:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 1.A-tP <br /> Edward Everett <br /> January 22,2004 <br /> Page 5 <br /> . <br /> not benefit the projec.~. However, successful prosecution of an appropriations request for <br /> federal cooperation is also dependent on taking advantage of all opportunities to make <br /> one's case on the appropriate legislative vehicle. The entire legislative year provides <br /> opportunities for funding. The percentages of success in the near tenn are reduced by <br /> delay. The ESA is a federal act being applied on Federal land, but, the opportunity to <br /> cooperate with a large municipality and county government, pennanently secure the <br /> future of a national wildlife preserve and provide for the conservation of endangered <br /> species on those lands should be a powerful inducement to solutions. <br /> Mr. Everett, you also asked me to address "what the City is getting for its money." I <br /> think this letter, in some small way, answers that question. But let me also mention to <br /> you other benefits the City has enjoyed from its relationship as client. Although 1 <br /> initially quoted you $300 per hour up to a limit of $30,000 for the feasibility study, I <br /> actually charged the City $230 dollars per hour because I was intrigued by the <br /> opportunity to manage a pro-environmentlpro-citizen effort. My regular rate takes into <br /> consideration my expertise and ability in miu1aging this type of project. Your retainer <br /> will not completely compensate me for the time I expect to expend managing this matter <br /> in Washington, D.C., and coordinating this effort in Redwood City. <br /> I believe the most economical method for the City to proceed is with a monthly retainer <br /> in the amount of $7,500 per month plus expenses. I hope to have the program complete, <br /> or substantially complete, within one year. We agree to review progress and performance <br /> in 3 months to assure satisfaction by the City. All other conditions of my letter of March <br /> 27,2003 shall continue to apply. <br /> ve'Ytrulyyours~ Q <br /> C.C/Jd( _ _,!(:,(k:: - - <br /> W.H. Fawcett- <br /> THE FOREGOING IS <br /> APPROVED AND AGREED TO: <br /> EDWARD EVERETT, City Manager <br /> City of Redwood City <br /> Date: <br /> WHF:ssg <br /> 14 1603.000 IIDA040 1 60.064] 01/22/04 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.