My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-01-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-01-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2006 9:24:32 AM
Creation date
1/23/2004 8:35:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 5.\t-lo <br /> SB 221 is similar in many respects to SB 610. However, it applies only to residential projects of <br /> 500 units or more and requires the land use planning agency to include as a condition of <br /> approval of a tentative map, parcel map or development agreement a requirement that <br /> "sufficient water supply" be available. Proof of a sufficient water supply must be based on a <br /> written verification from the public water system that will serve the development. <br /> Thus, the WSA required by SB 610 is to be prepared sufficiently early in the development <br /> review f'rocess that it can be incorporated in the CEOA evaluation and documentation of the <br /> project. In the case of a project which will require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the <br /> WSA should be available before the Draft EIR is released for public comment. SB 221, by <br /> contrast, becomes operative at the point that the city is considering approval of a tentative <br /> . subdivision map. <br /> The City's Roles and Responsibilities Under S8 610 <br /> Both SB 610 and SB 221 are drafted on the assumption that the land use planning agency (Le., <br /> the city or county) is not the water supplier for the proposed project. They thus impose distinct <br /> duties on the city/county and on the water supplier - which is assumed to be an entirely <br /> separate agency. <br /> In the case of Redwood City this assumption is incorrect since the City performs both roles. <br /> However, the statute's terminology, while awkward, can be adapted to our situation relatively <br /> easily. <br /> The "City," as that term is used in the statute, means the components of city government that <br /> have responsibilities for the land use decision process. At the staff level, this is the Community <br /> Development Services Department, Planning and Redevelopment Division. <br /> The "water supplier:' for SB 610 purposes, can be understood to mean the Public Works <br /> Services Department, which is responsible for the City's Water Enterprise Fund. <br /> The "governing body," as used in SB 610, refers to the City Council, which is required to <br /> approve the WSA at a regular or special meeting. <br /> Use of the WSA <br /> The WSA, including the information regarding plans for acquiring additional supplies, shall be <br /> included in the environmental document prepared for the project. In the case of Bayside <br /> Gardens, it will be included in the draft EIR, currently in preparation. <br /> At the stage of project approval/disapproval, the City "shall determine based on the entire <br /> record, whether projected water supplies will be sufficient to satisfy the demands of the project. <br /> in addition to existing and planned future uses." If the City determines at that point that water <br /> supplies will not be sufficient, it must include that determination in its findings for the project. <br /> Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) <br /> The City of Redwood City has adopted an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) pursuant to <br /> the State of California 1984 Urban Water Management Planning Act. The UWMP was last <br /> amended via Resolution No. 14530 of the City Council on June 2, 2003, and duly forwarded to <br /> the State of California Department of Water Resources, Office of Water Use Efficiency on July <br /> 30, 2003. <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.