My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-01-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-01-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2006 9:24:32 AM
Creation date
1/23/2004 8:35:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> . . ....., ~', " .,~~.,... ~".."':h":",' ~...._,_^W <br /> I ' 5. \ t.- '-to <br /> I <br /> - <br /> I implementation. detennining a fInanclng strategy, and in developing an initial rate and revenue <br /> plan. Refer 10 Figure es..1 for a schematic plan of AJtemative .0. TheprimaJy reason for <br /> recommending Alternative D Is that It Is the most Cost-effective project configuration that <br /> . provides an adequate water supply (1 ,955 AFtyr) 10: <br /> 1. Reduce existing demands on the San Fran<::lsoo Hetch Hetchy regional water system 10 <br /> I be within the City's con1ractual supplyauurance. <br /> 2. Provide a source of future water supply for potenliai new developmenlswlthin the City. <br /> I Altemative 0 also provides s/gnlllcant flexibility for the future, so the City can continue to explore <br /> the benefits of addiUonal water oonservallon measures, overall water supply reliability and <br /> , drought tolerance issues, water transfers and other water supply management options. If the <br /> City requires addiUonal recycled water supply In the futum, the pipelines provided under <br /> Alternative D.are oversized to a/Iow the sy$tem to elq)8l1daCl'OSS Bayshcn Highway 101lnlo <br /> Central RedwoOd CIty for a Clty--wldeprojeet (3.172 AFIyr as In Alternative B). The system <br /> , could also support expansion into adjacent communities to meet future needs If !he City were to <br /> negotiate agreements fOr lransmisslon <If water from SBSAto other retail water suppliers. <br /> I Additional benefits and considerations associated with recommending Alternative 0 are <br /> induded in Section 5 of this report. <br /> , The total estimate of probable capital cost, including facilities construclion, service connections <br /> and site retrofits. engineering, construction management, adminlstration and a 20% project <br /> contingency is approximately $36,819,000. The portion of this cost associated with providing <br /> I oversized pipelines for future flexibility is approximately $4,891,000. Alternative 0 capital costs <br /> are summarized In Table eS-1. <br /> I <br /> ~ <br /> , <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I Water Recycling Feasibility Study for RedWood City vii <br /> _.'...,.......-,- <br /> ~ .~ .~-,--_.,....--.'..",....,~~""' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.