Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 8. A.\8 <br /> Legislative Bill Action <br /> ............................................................... <br /> the League of Califomia Cities and Califomia State The League believes that much of the conflict <br /> Association of Countie§ to re.solve much of the over EMS govem& lce can be resolve, f if stake- <br /> conflict between local govemments on emergency holders are able to l"'Irticipate in EMS s:stem <br /> medical service (EMS) issues. For the last twenty design and evaluation and if complainan:s are <br /> years, cities and counties have had substantial given a fair and open hearing. AB 2293 provides <br /> conflicts regarding EMS, specifically over which of the framework for a solution to these long-standing <br /> these goveming entities has authority for establish- perceived conflicts between cities and counties, <br /> ing the level and provider of emergency ambu- the fire service and LEMSAs. Staff: Natasha <br /> lance service. Several lawsuits, including one that FODman; Status: AsHIth, 3130; Position: Sup- <br /> reached the state supreme court, have resulted. port/Co-Sponsor with CSAC, <br /> Although the Supreme Court case (City of San <br /> Bernardino vs. County of San Bernardino) found in <br /> favor of the counties, debate has continued to pit ~ <br /> county local EMS agencies (LEMSAs) against the <br /> cities and fire service in various parts of the state. ~ Navigating The <br /> Currently, the Emergency Medical Services <br /> System and the Pre-hospital Emergency Medical Legislative Process <br /> Care Personnel Act, permit each county to estab- Deadlines, Procedures and <br /> lish an emergency medical services program Common Terms <br /> under which the county is required to designate a <br /> local emergency medical services EMS agency. NEW: An overview of the budget process <br /> The act authorizes each county to establish an <br /> emergency medical care committee and also and special sessions <br /> authorizes the county to prescribe its member- <br /> ship. To resolve conflicts associated with current Plus: <br /> law, AB 2293 puts a local advisory committee and . A description of the legislative process <br /> appeals process for EMS issues into law. The . Tips on writing an effective letter and <br /> model's primary features include: testifying before a legislative <br /> . Each local EMS agency will have an Emer- committee <br /> gency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) with a . Suggestions on how to participate in <br /> prescribed membership that achieves a balance the League legislative program <br /> between city and county perspectives. The EMCC . A glossary of commonly used legislative <br /> reviews and evaluates the local EMS plan. and budget terms <br /> . A legislative calendar listing key state <br /> . The EMCC serves as the first level appeals budget dates for city officials <br /> body for complaints including, but not limited to, <br /> transportation, exclusive operating areas, con- This publication is available from the League for <br /> tracts and RFP competition. $5. There is a ten percent discount on orders of <br /> . If the EMCC decision is not acceptable to the five or more. <br /> complainant, the issue is referred to the State EMS Questions? Contact League Publications at <br /> Commission. That Commission will forward its <br /> recommendation to the local Board of Supervi- 916/658-8257 <br /> sors, which retains the final decision authority. Or order online at: www.cacities.org/store <br /> <br /> PAGE 12/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the league's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org <br />