AgdaPkt 2004-06-07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

�'� a W level review of architectural and design elements to ensure the safe passage of aircraft in flight in the vicinity of the project site. Such elements include but are not limited to reflective glass, site lighting, building lighting, size, type, and location of communication equipment, size and locations of HVAC exhaust vents, flag po/es, water features thaf may attract birds, and other items to th�� extenf in which they may impair the normal and safe operation of aircraft. The A� UC_staff and County Airport Manager review comments and/or suggested revisions shall be incorporated into the final building plans, if necessary, prior to the city issuing a building permit(s) for each construction phase. Staff is concerned that the City may be giving up some of its building permit review authority to the County who could request significant changes to the project and/or hold up the building permit process. Although the County's (and City's) intent is to provide safe and normal operation of aircraft in the vicinity, as currently written this condition could impact the City's discretion over the project. Staff believes that it can achieve that same goal of safety by proposing the following wording (note: new text is underlined): ' The Develover shall submif a set of final building plans for each construction phase of the project to ALUC staff and to the County Airport Manager for staff level review of architectural and design elements to ensure the safe passage of aircraft in flight in fhe vicinity of the project site. Such elements ' shall be limited to reflective g/ass, site lighting, building lighting, size, type, and location of communication equipment, size and locations of HVAC exhaust vents, flag poles, aAe! wafer features that may attract birds, and other desiqn items to the extent in which thev mav impair the normal and safe oaeration of aircraft. The ALUC staff and County Airport Manager review comments and/or suggested revisions s�e � , . are advisorv onl� v � ` V 0� , Tom Passanisi o I Patterson d Everett Principal Ptanner Community Development Services City Manager Director ATTACHMENTS A. Proposed Revised Conditions to Precise Plan B. Proposed Revision to Section XIV (F) (Findings for Project Alternatives) C. Staff Report dated May 24, 2004. (Note: Attachments to that staff report were previously sent to City Council and are also availabte in the City Clerk's Office) 6