Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 8.A-5 <br /> Legislative Bill Action <br /> ............................................................... <br /> The following are summaries of just a few of the legislative bills that are currently being acted upon <br /> by the Le~~ of ~~lifornia Citie~. For m~e informat. ~r. about these and other bills, please visit <br /> the League webslte s .to acce~s rnfor~atton about le.gr- ~Iétion, policy issues and related develop- <br /> me~ts.. You can ~rack information on bills (www.cacltie::i.orgllegtracking),locate legislators and <br /> legislatIve ~?mmlttees, send letters to legislators or the media through the online Advocacy Center <br /> (.www.cacitles,org/advocacycenter), research League policy positions, access useful related <br /> links, and much more. <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES In addition, the League believes that S8 494 is <br /> premature. If enacted, it would prejudge the <br /> S8 494 (Escutia). Medi-cal Liens. Last outcome of the Parnell case (Parnell v. Adventist <br /> September, during the waning days of the 2003 Health Systems), which is now before the Su- <br /> legislative session, S8 494 became the poster preme Court. The case has been briefed, but oral <br /> child for the unfortunate but often-used end-of-the- arguments have not been set. In addition, it could <br /> session gut and amend tactic. Strongly opposed set a precedent for Medi-Cal cases which could <br /> by the League, the insurance industry and sup- form the basis of subsequent legislation to expand <br /> porters of tort reform, the bill failed passage in the the issue to all insured, or give the courts a direc- <br /> Assembly Health Committee. Since reconsidera- tion to go in awarding settlements. <br /> tion was granted, S8 494 had the potential to be <br /> resurrected. Now, it is back and will be heard in Cities should share S8 494 with their city <br /> the Assembly Health Committee Tuesday June 8. attorneys and risk managers and IMMEDIATELY <br /> send a letter of opposition to members of the <br /> Recent amendments to the bill do not remove Assembly Health Committee and to their Assem- <br /> the League's opposition, which is focused on bly Members. Staff: Yvonne Hunter; Status: <br /> Section 2 of the bill. The League's objections to AsHlth, Hrg. June 8; Position: Oppose. <br /> S8 494 remain generally the same as they were <br /> when we initially registered our opposition last <br /> September. Under existing law and practice, PUBLIC SAFETY <br /> many health insurers have contracts with health <br /> providers that pay a reduced rate from what health AB 1655 (Negrete McLeod). Emergency <br /> providers bill as their "reasonable or full retail <br /> rate." The provider is then precluded from bal- Medical Services. Paramedics. A8 1655 <br /> ance billing the beneficiary for any difference authorizes the Emergency Medical Services <br /> between the contract price and the full retail rate. Authority (EMSA) to impose an administrative fine <br /> on licensed paramedics for disciplinary purposes <br /> S8 494 would change this practice for Medi- and requires that all funds recovered be deposited <br /> Cal patients and permit cost recovery beyond the into the General Fund. In addition, AB 1655 <br /> negotiated rate. In doing so, the bill could make a requires employers to report certain disciplinary <br /> local government, either through its own self- actions taken against paramedics to EMSA and <br /> insurance policy or through an outside insurance the local Emergency Medical Services (EMS) <br /> provider, liable for the inflated phantom medical agency medical director. <br /> bills. And, it would do so without an opportunity for Currently, suspension of a paramedic's Ii- <br /> medical review to determine the appropriateness <br /> of those costs. cense is the primary means of discipline for <br /> Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 5 <br /> -- <br />