Laserfiche WebLink
(:ryptospondium (part 2 of 2) Page 1 of 11 <br /> �� �-Z3 <br /> �� � <br /> ��� snN �ncesc�o Pu6Gc Utilities Commisaion <br /> Cryptosporidium (part 2 of 2) <br /> In 1997, the SFPUC staff were part of a nationwide effort coordinated by the American <br /> Water Works Association Research Foundation (AWWARF) entitled Critical Evaluations of <br /> Cryptosporidium Research and Research needs. The document outlines a long-term <br /> research strategy for the water industry. <br /> Individual agency activities as of December 1992 are summarized in Appendix A. <br /> References to Cryptosporidium concentrations are difficult to interpret due to differences <br /> in method and sample volume. <br /> San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Activities <br /> The SFPUC has been aggressively pursuing the issue of Cryptospo�idium in the following <br /> manner: <br /> ■ Monitorina - Preliminary monitoring for Giardia and Cryptosporidium was <br /> conducted in 1990. This has been followed by an intensive 12-month monitoring <br /> program for all sources, both treatment plants, and two distribution system <br /> reservoirs. The program has been completed, although some monitoring <br /> continues. <br /> ■ Consultations - A number of ineetings have taken place with DHS staff regarding <br /> Cryptosporidium. In July 1992, the SFPUC met with health officials from the four <br /> Bay Area counties served by the SFPUC to discuss the significance of waterborne <br /> Cryptosporidium. In November 1992, SFPUC staff met with four water utilities to <br /> discuss their respective programs on Cryptosporidium (Appendix B). In January <br /> 1993, the SFPUC convened a workshop with regulatory authorities (i.e., DHS and <br /> EPA), public health officials, researchers and medical experts to discuss the <br /> incidence of cryptosporidiosis, its relative public health significance, current <br /> research, and potential studies to address the major uncertainties (Appendix C). A <br /> Bay Area workshop was held in June 1995 to evaluate a disease surveillance <br /> program and to discuss risk communication issues (Appendix D). The SFPUC <br /> conducted stakeholder interviews to assess public concern and attitudes towards <br /> costs of various treatment alternatives in 1995. Findings of these interviews <br /> indicated a low public awareness of Cryptosporidium, though high concern among <br /> water treatment and public health professionals. In addition, San Francisco <br /> supervisor Carole Migden formed a 17 member multi-disciplinary Cryptosporidium <br /> task force for the purpose of developing guidelines for public notification of <br /> immunocompromised individuals and the general public. Due to a concurrent risk <br /> communication effort by a consortium of water utilities and DHS, this committee <br /> never completed its work. In late-1996, the SFPUC began regular strategy <br /> sessions with the major unfiltered sources in the U.S. (i.e., Boston, New York City, <br /> http:/lsfwater.org/printContent.cfin/C_ID/445/ 10/19/2004 <br /> �. _.. _ �.. _ <br />