Laserfiche WebLink
! <br /> . , <br /> _ 5�18=3 . <br /> , SECTION 6. NO STRIKE <br /> The Associafion, its members and repcesentatives, agree that it and they will not <br /> engage in, auEhorize, sar�ction, or support any strike, slowdown, stoppage of work, <br /> cu�ailment of production, coFrcerted refusat o# ouer-Lime work, refusal to operate <br /> designated equipment (provided such equipmenf is safe and sound) or to perform <br /> customary duties; and neither the Association nor any representatives thereof shall _ <br /> engage in job action for the pur.pose of e�fecting changes in the dicectives or decisions <br /> of management of the City, not to effect a change of personnel or operations of <br /> mana�er�rent or of ernployees not covered by this MOU. - <br /> SECTIOM 7. .PAY <br /> 7.1 Salarv increases <br /> 7.1.1 Effective with the first futl pay period beginning on or after 5eptember <br /> 1, 2002, September 1, 2003, and September 1, 2004, salaries shall be <br /> . calculated by comparing tt�e totat compensa�ion rates of Pol�ce Qfficers - <br /> in R�dwood Ci�y to the .average tota! compensation of Police Officers in <br /> the following tisted cities: -Mountair� �ew, Palo Alto, San Mateo, South � - <br /> San Francisco, Urrion Cit�r, Milpitas and Santa Clara. <br /> 7.1.2 The comparative calculation shall include top step base satary, <br /> empioyee PERS payments, educational incentives, and health and . <br /> welfare contributions. <br /> 7.1.3 The total compensation comparison shall be effective Septembec 1, <br /> 2002, and annuatly fihereafter on Septembec '1, during the tecm of the <br /> - MOU. <br /> 7.1.4 In the event one or mo�e of the above listed comparative cities is in <br /> labor negotiatio� due to the expiration of their lat�or MOU and does not <br /> have salary data avaitable as of September 1, 2002, September 1, 2003, <br /> or September 1, 2004, the total comp�ensation factor fnr those cities <br /> shall be equal to the Consumer Price Index for all Urban :Consumers for - <br /> the San Francisco/San Jose area for Lhe preceding. fiscat year. T#�is <br /> factor shail be no less than 4% nor greater than 7� should the C.P.I. fall_ _ <br /> bel+ow or exceed th+ese percentages. <br /> � 7.1:5 �nitia� appointments shall normally be made at the .lowest ste,p or rate. � <br /> of pay. Upon approval of the Council, such appoirrtments may be rnade, <br /> at the second or third step, justified by considerat�on of the di�fficult�r <br /> of lacating qualifierJ pecsonnel and an appoint�'s experience, <br /> 4 <br /> b <br /> _.. _ . _ <br />