My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-08-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-08-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2006 3:46:36 PM
Creation date
8/24/2006 12:05:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
8/28/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> B. Claim from Evercom Systems, Inc. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Staff recommends the rejection of subject claim. MINUTE ORDER 06-165 <br />************************************************************************************************************************* <br />7. STAFF REPORTS <br />A. Capital Improvement Program Short Term Spending Limit <br /> Manager, Engineering and Construction Chang explained the program. <br /> Council made comments and asked questions pertaining to the Jardin de Ninos <br /> Park/Restroom project and the Senior Center Master Plan. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> M/S HartnettlBain reviewed and approved the proposed short term spending limit for <br /> the FY 2006-2007 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget. The motion passed <br /> by a unanimous voice vote. MINUTE ORDER 06-167 <br />B. Transportation Study Session <br /> Community Development Services Director Ingram highlighted some of the <br /> information provided in the packet by the work of Consultant Bruce Liedstrand. <br /> 1. Downtown and the Transportation Systems that support it <br /> Council Members commented about the Caltrain Board 2025 Plan to take fixed rail <br /> two generations forward to an electrified system with a frequency of up to a train every <br /> 6 minutes that is more feasible than a possible statewide system. Comments included <br /> the need to be involved with Depot Circle and its location, that SamTrans' mission is <br /> being studied, that grade separations whether above or underground are necessary, <br /> and that a street connection to the train station should be considered. <br /> Public Comment: <br /> Jim Bigelow, Redwood City/San Mateo County Chamber of Commerce, stated that the <br /> report was excellent and that San Mateo County Transportation Authority needs to <br /> respond to the City on the next step in station area planning. He stated that Redwood <br /> City should be successful in obtaining study money considering the heavy CalTrain <br /> station use and the SamTrans station. Regarding grade separations, he emphasized <br /> community outreach and alternatives. He further stated that the TOD and Precise Plan <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 7, 2006 <br />MEETING MINUTES PAGE 4 <br /> - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.