My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-08-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-08-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2006 3:46:36 PM
Creation date
8/24/2006 12:05:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
8/28/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 78 <br /> SBWMA Contractor Selection Process ExeculT"ve summa,j?age 23 <br /> - "..... ........ 1 ""'qIlIl . <br /> Summary of PAF and PAC Recommendations <br /> Estimated CollectIon Optional fur <br /> Rate Impact Mem~:er AQ:encies <br /> Facility Plans <br /> . Single stream processing In residential and <br /> commercial single stream <br /> rate impact <br /> . Transfer station expansion 0.34% - 0.41 % <br /> Subtotal 0.34%-0.41% <br /> Contract Terms <br /> . SBWMA ownership and financing of equipment (5.30%) ~ (0.51%) Optional <br /> . Simplified compensation mechanism (0.04%) <br /> . Alternative fuel vehicles (capital only) 0% - 2.70% Optional <br /> . Incentive structure to encourage performance 0% - 0.75% Optional <br /> Subtotal (5.34%) - 2.90% <br /> Total inciudina savings related to SBWMA ownership (2.09%)-12.74%* <br /> of equipment <br /> Total excludina savings related to SBWMA 3.21% - 13.25% <br /> equipment ownership <br /> *Other costs for programs and contract terms may be in addition to this estimate. <br /> The estimated fiscal impacts are planning-level estimates. Many factors may impact the <br /> actual rate impact including, but not limited to, the following factors: <br /> . A more detailed cost analysis may yield different estimated rate impacts. <br /> . The competitive environment under which proposals will be received. <br /> . Level of member agency participation in the contractor selection process and in <br /> particular programs (e.g., curbside collection). <br /> . Proposers' technical approach, operational assumptions, and profit requirements. <br /> . Off-site organics processing site and the related transportation and processing <br /> costs. <br /> . Recycling program participation in terms of the number of customers and the <br /> frequency and volume of materials collected. <br /> Hiltan Farnkopf & Hobson, LLe ES-16 <br /> - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.