My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-08-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-08-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2006 3:46:36 PM
Creation date
8/24/2006 12:05:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
8/28/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 9A <br />FIND A BILL, LEGIS LA TORS, LEG COMMITTEE - OR ASK LEG STAFF Page 26 <br />Visit (and bookmark!) the League's Leaislative Resources page (www.cacities.ora/leqresources). <br />You'll find a roster and contact information for the League's legislative staff; the online Bill Search <br />program, background materials on lobbying your legislators, and more. <br />LEGISLA riVE BILL SUMMARIES <br />ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY <br />A8 802 (Wolk). Flood Control. General Plans. AB 802, supported by the league, would <br />require cities and counties to update their General Plans to better address flood safety issues. <br />Much of the language in AB 802 is consistent with what is currently included in the General Plan <br />Guidelines, which suggest optional criteria to include in general plans to address flooding. The <br />concept of ~ is to ensure that all general plans address basic flood related issues so that <br />cities and counties can plan accordingly. <br />AB 802 is now on the Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense File, but is anticipated to <br />move to the Senate Floor soon. At this point, AB 802 has no known opposition. Staff: Yvonne <br />Hunter; Status: SenAppr Suspense File; Position: Support. <br />AB 1899 (Walk). Show Me the Flood Protection. AB 1899 is a work in progress - and is now <br />residing on the Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense File. Limited to the Sacramento-San <br />Joaquin River valleys, the intent of AB 1899 is to ensure that new development in areas that <br />could flood to a depth of three feet or more have adequate flood protection. This includes "firm" <br />100 year protection, as well as plans to achieve 200 year protection. <br />Over the summer legislative recess, numerous meetings have been held among interested <br />stakeholders. the Administration and Assemblymember Wolk's office to consider alternative <br />concepts. At this time, legislative language is not yet available, but it is clear that the bill in Its <br />current form will undergo fairly significant amendments. <br />The League has participated in those meetings. We have raised a number of significant issues <br />which the League will use to evaluate what position to ultimately take on the bill as it moves <br />forward. Those issues are listed on the League's June 20 and June 28 letters to the author. It is <br />likely that this will be an issue that is resolved - or not - in the last days of the session. Stay <br />tuned! Staff: Yvonne Hunter; Status: SenAppr Suspense File; Position: Pending. <br />AS 1951 (Goldberg). Capital Facilities Fees. AB 2951 (Goldberg) would clarify that municipal <br />utilities may charge other public agencies capital facilities fees. Copies of the League's fetters <br />supporting AB 2951 are available on the League's website. Cities with municipal electric, gas, <br />water, and sewer utilities should be sure they have sent letters of support to their senators and <br />assembly members. AB 2951 is scheduled to be heard in the Senate Appropriations Committee <br />next week. Staff: Yvonne Hunter; Status: SenAppr; Position: Support. <br />PUBLIC SAFETY <br />S8 412 (Figueroa). Massage Therapy. The League is now neutral on SB 412 (Figueroa). This <br />measure would propose a system to certify massage therapists who meet specifIC educational <br />and professional qualifications. It would prohibit local governments from regulating anyone who <br />is a certified massage therapist, but would permit local governments to regulate anyone who <br />wishes to operate as a massage therapist, but who is not certified. <br />The bill would also permit local governments to regulate the business where the certified <br />massage therapists operate, as long as the regulation is non~discriminatory (i.e., does not impose <br />stricter land use requirements than other professional businesses such as a physical therapists <br />businesses) . <br />9 <br /> - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.