Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 9A <br />HOT BILLS from page 5 . ... ...... ......... . ....... .. II" .. II ... .. .... .... .. to ... ... ......... .. .j;ilage 34 <br />League and others. The goal of the bill is to This bill continues to meddle with the standard <br />streamline local approval processes to co-Iocate for "blighf in determining a redevelopment area by <br />antennas, towers and telecommunications requiring findings that each blight factor is signifi- <br />devices on existing structures. With August 10 cantly worse in the blighted area than the rest of <br />amendments that allow a local agency to limit to the city. Ironically, this will make blight findings <br />less than 10 years the term of a permit for public most difficult in large and less affluent communi- <br />safety reasons or substantial land use concems, ties. <br />the league has removed its opposition to the bill. <br /> SB 1322 (Cedillo), as amended August 7. <br />EMPLOYEE RELATIONS Housing. League pOSition: Oppose. <br />AB 3026 (Lieber), as amended August 16. This bill would require agencies to identify by- <br />Workers Compensation: Peace Officers. right zoning in the housing element for emergency <br />League position: Oppose. shelters and expand application ofthe anti-NIMBY <br /> law to special needs facilities housing seven or <br />This is another "gut-and-amend." which we more people. There is no limit on the size. A <br />alerted cities to last week. This bill would sub- special needs facility includes social rehabilitation <br />stantively exempt local agency peace officer facilities and adult day program facilities. <br />employees from the managed medical care <br />provisions that were included in the 2004 workers' AB 2511 (Jones), as amended August 7. <br />compensation reforms contained in SB 899 Land use: Housing. League position: Opo. <br />(Poochigian). In addition, the bill contains provi- pose. <br />sions that could significantly increase extended <br />leave benefits for local agency peace officer This bill would impose sandions on local <br />employees. The bill would mandate huge costs governments who fail to file annually a yet~to-be- <br />upon local agencies that we believe are claimable completed form with the California Department of <br />as reimbursable state mandates. Housing and Community Development describing <br /> their compliance on their housing element. <br />We urge cities to write to their senator to <br />ask for a NO vote on this measure. Also, PUBLIC SAFETY <br />write your assemblymember with the same <br />message and write the Governor to urge a AS 1405, (Evans)- as amended August 14. <br />veto if the bill is passed by the Legislature. local Fire Department Staffing Standards. <br /> League position: Oppose. <br />This bill is on the Senate floor and could <br />be brought up at any time. (It may first be sent This is a classic example of uend-of-session <br />to the Senate Labor and Industrial Relations gut-and-amend. U Until August 14, this bill dealt with <br />Committee for a quick hearing prior to being re- disaster relief, and was parked on the Senate floor, <br />sent to the Senate floor - but this would happen without coming up for hearing. <br />quickly, perhaps all within one day.) Visit <br />www.cacities.orQ/billsearch and look up AB 3026 But on August 14, it was amended to increase <br />to view both a joint league/local agency letter and the data reporting requirements of local fire agen- <br />a sample letter. cies, and requiring that the State Fire Marshall <br /> compare that data to NFPA 1710- a voluntary <br />LAND USE AND HOUSING standard produced by the National Fire Protection <br /> Association. <br />SB 1206 (Kehoe), as amended August 8. <br />Redevelopment League position: Oppose. <br /> Continued on Page 7 <br />PAGE 6 - PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League', OffIcial Website--www.cacities.org <br />August 18,2006 . Issue #33 <br /> .---...... ._n _.._ <br />