Laserfiche WebLink
s��v�• <br /> i��r�■ <br /> 9A <br /> Page 21 <br /> P�QP 90frorrrpag� l5 . . � . � � a. . . . . . . d. � .. m . � . wde � d , . . e .. . �. .. e � � s. . a <br /> of their property,taking into consideration existing "The pr�b/em for Propositiorr 90 advocates is <br /> timitations on how the properly can be used(e.g., that fheir inifiative is a manifesta that addresses <br /> zoni�g restrictions}, !n some cases, Prop. 94 far more than the grievance that they hoped <br /> would require govemment to pay owners more would spark a r�svalutian." <br /> than the fair market value of their property by <br /> directing courts to ign�e these use fimitatior�s. To read the editorials and cotumns, visiE <br /> ti+uww•n�R�a��.curn. <br /> For a copy of Et�fuil report,visit <br /> www.no{Lro,�9Q.com. "N�on Prop.SO" Coalrtion Co�tinues ta <br /> Grow. More and more organ¢a�ons and indi- <br /> "No on Prop.90" Editorials viduals are joining the"No on Prop.90°coalition, <br /> as they become more familiar with#he cynical <br /> The Pesaciena Star IVews, Whittier Daily "taxpayer trap"provisions in this measure. Here <br /> News, San Gabrrel t/alley Tribune and Rnrerside is a list af those indnriduals and aganizations <br /> Press-Enterprise published ediiorials against the that have joined this week. For a complete list, <br /> measure, bringing to '10 the total number of visit�.nac�roo.90.com. <br /> '�oPP�+se"editorials: <br /> Business: <br /> � Pasadena Star News, (9/27t06) • San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership <br /> • Wf�iftierDaily News, (9/27/06) • Sunnyvale Chamber of Commerce <br /> • San Gab►�el Va/ley Tribune,(9/27/06) • Long Beach Area Chambec of Commerce <br /> • Riverside Pr�ss-Enterprise, {9/25/Q6) • Sacramento Converrtion&�s�tws Bureau <br /> • Sacremento Bee, (9/96/06j • Napa Chamber of Commerce <br /> • Napa Valley Regis#er, (9/14/O6) • 4range County Busi�ss Council <br /> • Mountain View Voice,(9l08/06) <br /> • Santa Rosa Pnsss Democraf, (9N1/06} Taxpayers: <br /> • Torrance Daily Breeae, (8/23/06; • Caiifomia Taxpayers'Association <br /> • San Diego Union-Trrbune,(8/22/q6) <br /> Housing AdvocateslProviders: <br /> Key editorial quo#es this week: • Non-Rrofit Fiausing Association of <br /> Northem Caiifomia <br /> "PROPOSITION 90#�ackers want voters to • EAN Housi�g(Ecumenical Associatian far <br /> think the far-reaching measure simpiy protects H����9) <br /> home ownership_ !n reality,it would change the • Community Housing Partnership <br /> way govemment operates and limit the right of • San Diego County Mobifehome Positive <br /> reside�ts to dec�de land-use in their communi- Ac#ion Cammittee <br /> ties.°-Pasaatena Star lYews(9/27/�6) <br /> Agricuiture: <br /> "Such iaws encourage fivolous lawsuits • Kings County Farm Bureau <br /> against cfies,aounties and the shate that wsll have <br /> to be de#ended with pubtic money."-Whftfler Transportatian: <br /> Daily lYews(9/27/06) • California Transit Association <br /> • Metr�oiitan Transportation Commission <br /> Additionally, Ventura Cou»ty Star Political <br /> Columnist Timm Werttt had this to say about Prop. yya��.; <br /> 90(n his column on September 27: • Friends of Laca(�y Owned Water <br /> Confinued on Page 97 <br /> PAGE 16•PRIORITY FOCUS �sit the League's aPffcia) Webske-•www.cacitie.s.org <br /> Sepfiember 29, 2008•Issue#38 <br />