My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-11-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-11-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2006 11:50:15 AM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:07:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
11/13/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7A <br />FEDERAL UPDATE from page 14 ..... .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. .. ppge 15 <br /> <br />conference report would authorize $400 million <br />annually from FY 2007 through 2011 for local port <br />security grants. It also would authorize $443 <br />million for the container security initiative and $212 <br />million for the Customs-Trade Partnership Against <br />Terrorism (C- TPAT) over the life of the measure. <br /> <br />C-TPAT is a voluntary supply chain security <br />program led by U.S. Customs and Border Protec- <br />tion (CBP) and focused on improving the security <br />of private companies' supply chains with respect <br />to terrorism. The bill would also require the 22 <br />largest U.S. ports to scan all incoming containers <br />for radiological weapons by the end of 2007. <br /> <br />The Conference report did not include $4.5 <br />billion in rail and mass transit security from the <br />Senate-passed version of the measure. The bill <br />has been sent to the president, who is expected to <br />sign the measure into law. <br /> <br />Immigration Refonn <br /> <br />Prior to adjourning last week, the House <br />passed a series of immigration reform measures <br />comprised of elements of H.R. 4437, a broader <br />border security/immigration reform bill passed by <br />the chamber in November of 2005. Two of those <br />bills were also adopted by the Senate-H.R. 4830 <br />and H.R. 6061. <br /> <br />The language of H.R. 4830, which would set <br />new criminal penalties for constructing tunnels <br />under the U.S. border and double penalties for <br />smuggling illegal immigrants. drugs. weapons of <br />mass destruction or other illegal items through an <br />illegal tunnel, was included in the final House and <br />Senate-passed FY 2007 Homeland Security <br />appropriations conference agreement. H.R. 6061 <br />authorizes 700 miles of fencing along the south- <br />western border with Mexico. President Bush is <br />expected to sign the bill, which would also autho- <br />rize a 'virtual fenceR of sensors, cameras, un- <br />manned aerial vehicles and other surveillance <br />technology to be deployed along the border. <br /> <br />House and Senate leaders remain at odds <br />over major provisions of a more expansive immi- <br />gration reform package. House Republican <br />leadership continues to embrace a border-security <br />first approach to any overhaul of federal immigra- <br />tion law, and oppose language in the Senate- <br />passed immigration reform measure (S. 2611) <br />that would establish a guest worker program and <br />a path to citizenship for the estimated 12 million <br />illegal immigrants in the country. Facing a full <br />legislative calendar when they return for a post- <br />election session in November, legislators are <br />unlikely to pass comprehensive immigration <br />reform this year. <br /> <br />House Passes Local Zoning Pre-Emption <br />Legislation <br /> <br />On September 29, the House approved H.R. <br />4772, the Private Property Rights Implementation <br />Act of 2006 by a vote of 231-181. The measure <br />failed to gain the requisite number of votes neces- <br />sary for passage earlier in the week when Repub- <br />lican leaders brought it to the floor for consider- <br />ation under suspension of the rules, an expedited <br />procedure that requires a two-thirds majority (270 <br />votes) for passage. The bill was successful upon <br />returning to the floor on September 29 under a rule <br />that required a simple majority to pass. <br /> <br />The bill would impact land-use regulation <br />nationwide, allowing developers and property <br />owners to challenge local and state rulings in <br />federal court, rather than in state court, as current <br />law dictates. The bill would also enable large <br />developers with significant financial resources <br />who are unhappy with unfavorable local zoning <br />decisions to tie up cities and zoning boards in <br />costly litigation every zoning decision in federal <br />courts. <br /> <br />The majority of the California Congressional <br />delegation opposed the measure. A breakdown of <br />the delegation's vote on the measure is below. <br />The Senate is not expected to act on the bill when <br />Congress returns for a short legislative session <br />following the November elections. <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Website--www.cacitles.org <br /> <br />Continued on Page 16 <br /> <br />PRIORITY FOCUS . PAGE 15 <br />October 6, 2006 . Issue #39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.