My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-10-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-10-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:40:09 PM
Creation date
10/9/2003 3:26:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/13/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�o.�-z <br /> is not required in order to provide affordable housing; and b) the incentive or <br /> concession would have a specific adverse impact (as defined in the Govemment Code) <br /> and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse <br /> impact without making the development unaffordable to low and moderate income <br /> households. <br /> Finally, the new law requires that when calculating a density bonus all fractional <br /> remainders are rounded up. <br /> Accessorv Dwellin4 Units <br /> The new law also requires that accessory dwell�ng units (sometimes referred to as <br /> second units , in law units or granny flats ) must now be processed via a <br /> "ministerial" (by-right) process rather then a"discretionary process°. Staff would have <br /> to review the application by strict objective criteria ("yes/no" questions) with no <br /> discretion. Staff is proposing no change to the Ciry's requirements for accessory <br /> dwellings (e.g. size of units, number of parking spaces, etc.) because these conditions <br /> are already measurable and objective. <br /> However, there is a current requirement for an "Architectural PermiY' for accessory <br /> dwellings (i.e. meaning design review of the unit) and this may be deemed <br /> "discretionary" or subjective. For that reason, staff will be eliminating Architectural <br /> Permit review for one story units. (Most, of the accessory dwelling units are one-story, <br /> located in the rear of the structure, and typically conform to the architecture of the main <br /> house). However, staff still psans to require an Architectural Permit for second story <br /> units because of their higher visibility. But, in keeping in the spirit of the new law, staff <br /> will establish specific and measurable design criteria for these second story accessory <br /> dwelling units. Those criteria are currently being developed by staff. <br /> Initiation of Amendments <br /> Finally, under Article 41 of the Zoning Ordinance (Amendments), staff currently cannot <br /> initiate amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Only the Planning Commission, City <br /> Council or applicant can initiate such changes. The proposed change would also allow <br /> staff to initiate amendments. As is currently done, staff will still present any <br /> amendment to both the Planning Commission and City Council for its review and <br /> approval. <br /> Based on past history, these new laws will have little impact, if any, to the City's <br /> development process. The City has never received an application for a density bonus <br /> from a private developer. Also the City only processes approximately 5- 10 accessory <br /> units per year and these new units usually have been able to meet the City's <br /> requirements. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments on August 5, 2003, <br /> and unanimously recommended approval of all the amendments to the City Council. <br /> z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.