Laserfiche WebLink
/� �-z <br /> RECENT LEGqI ADVOCACY FILINGS <br /> The League would like to extend special opportunities for union members, and the city was <br /> thanks to the volunteer brief writers listed below required to exhaust the impasse requirements of <br /> for their efforts on behalf of the Le2�ue. League the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. <br /> action and brief summaries of the cases appear <br /> � The name of the cas� is Sacramento Police <br /> Officers Association v. Ciry of Sacramento, No. <br /> City May Deny Funding to Groups that ��2493 (3d Dist.). <br /> Discriminate <br /> The League filed a friend-of-the-court brief with Conservation Easements and Farmland <br /> the California Supreme Court urging the court to Loss <br /> a�rm the court of appeal ruling favorable to cities. The League wrote a letter to the court of <br /> The case involves the amount of discretion local appeal urging it to pubiish an opinion that would <br /> governments have to allocate their resources and provide guidance to public agencies regarding <br /> funds to effect local policy. The League thanks farmland loss related to new development and <br /> Ellen Forman, Deputy City Attomey, San CEQA mitigation. The League thanks Dan <br /> Francisco, for writing the friend-of-the-court brief McHugh, City Attomey, Redlands, for writing a <br /> to the California Supreme Court. letter in support of publication on behalf of the <br /> The issue arose in the context of the city League. The decision was recently published. <br /> declining to provide a community organization free The case arose in the context of the construc- <br /> access to berths at the marina because the tion of a new prison in Kem County. The court <br /> organization refused to agree that it would not concluded that cumulative impacts analysis of <br /> discriminate in providing access to its program. loss of farmland was appropriate for determining <br /> The organization's access policy violated the city's whether the Department of Corrections properly <br /> non-discrimination law, and the court of appeal considered mitigation measures that might reduce <br /> concluded that the city could place conditions on impact on farmlar.d caused by proposed prison <br /> the allocation of their funds to promote local policy. construction. The name of the case is Friends of <br /> The name of the case is Evans v. Cify of Berke- the Kangaroo Rat v. Califomia Department of <br /> ley, No. S112621. Corrections, No. F040956 _ Cal. Rptr. 3d _ <br /> (5th Dist., Aug. 18, 2003). <br /> Hiring Temporary Peace Officers <br /> The League recently filed a friend-of-the-court <br /> brief with the court of appeal urging the court to <br /> reverse the trial court ruling in a case related to • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ .. . ■ ■ ■ . .. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ <br /> the temporary hiring of retired peace o�cers. The : ■ <br /> League thanks Charles Sakai and Jeff • SAVE THE DATE ! • <br /> Sloan,with Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld � � <br /> Kraemer 8 Sloan, LLP for writing the friend-of- i . <br /> the-court brief to the court of appeal. : LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIq CITIES : <br /> The trial court concluded that the city was : LEGISLATIVE BRIEFINGS ' <br /> required to meet and confer with police unions ' ' <br /> prior to temporarily re-hiring retired peace officers � � <br /> to achieve necessary staffing levels while the ciry ; November 19 in Ontario ' <br /> recruited replacement personnel for those who • November 21 in Sacramento ; <br /> retired. The trial court concluded that there would ■ ■ <br /> be an impact to the promotional or overtime ' ' <br /> ..............................: <br /> PAGE 2/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org <br />