My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-10-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-10-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:40:09 PM
Creation date
10/9/2003 3:26:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/13/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
//. �¢-23 <br /> INITIATIVE from page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • ORANGE COUNTY from page 1' • • ' • ' • ' ' <br /> __ As reported earlier, the goal of the initiative is Also at the October 9 Division meeting, Lake <br /> simply to require that the voters be consuRed before Forest Mayor Richard Dixon, a member of the <br /> the legislature reduces critical local revenues. If Or�nge County CITIpAC Fund�� g Committee, <br /> "structural reforms" considered by the legislature in _ will � a briefing •on the fun�raising program. <br /> the future would reduce individual local revenues, <br /> they would be subject to the same requirement. The On September 18, tne Orange County Regis- <br /> batlot measure would not raise taxes, repeal existing ter published an op-ed on the `triple flip' written by <br /> laws , change the allocation of property ar other The Orange County Division Advocacy Commit- <br /> taxes, expand the taxation powers of local govern- tee. It IS the first piece written joinUy by the Advo- <br /> ments nor require the retum of property taxes �c Committee. After describin the tri le fli <br /> already taken. It would do two simple things: y 9 p p <br /> and the history of state takeaways of local rev- <br /> • Public Vote Reauired. Require approval by a enues, the op-ed states: <br /> majority of the electorate before a proposed state law <br /> may take effect that reduces local tax revenues "Taxpayers deserve to have their dollars <br /> (sales, property and VLF) to cities, counties and refumed to the local level. Cities provide the <br /> special districts (including RDAs); an essential services that we use, such as police, <br /> • Reimburse for Mandated Costs. Clarify that . fire, libraries, and parks to name just a few. Cities <br /> the state must reimburse local governments for a new also do a better job of balancing their budgets and <br /> mandated program or higher level of service, protect- hofding the line on spending than Sacramento. <br /> ing local governments from cost shifts. While State budgets grew and glew, cities kept <br /> spending down in the hard times. In the past ten <br /> If all goes according to plan, the initiative will be years, city spending is down nine percent while <br /> submitted to the Attorney General tor title and sum- State spending is up 21 percent. In the past hvo <br /> mary in mid-October. Copies of the measure as years alone, cities have `given" over $1 billion to <br /> submitted will be shared with League members the state so it could balance its budget This is <br /> _ shortly thereafter. why we canY trust the Legislature to triple Bip away <br /> BUDGET from page 1 • ' • • • • • • • • • • • . . city dolfars. <br /> • In January, Governor Davis recommended- "The good news is the�e is still fime to reverse <br /> eliminating the vehicle license fee (VLF) backfill the triple-flip and stop fhe use of any /ocal dollars <br /> altogether. In the final budget, locals are temporarily �n this shell game scheme. As written, fhe compli- <br /> losing �825 million in VLF backfill, to be repaid in cated shift-shaR of loca/ govemments wouldnY <br /> 2006. begin until the middle of next year. The state can <br /> • In January, Governor Davis recommended a do this Scheme with its own money and it should." <br /> shift from Redevelopment Associations to ERAF <br /> beginning at $250 million, and increasing by 25% ;' ��"' �""""" """" ""' <br /> ■ <br /> each year after that (for 15 years). The final budget ; REGISTER NOW! � <br /> included a shift of only $135 million. . � <br /> While there are clearly other impacts imposed : ; <br /> upon cities by the final budget, most notably the "triple ; I.EAq,IE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ; <br /> ( ip' swap of Br9dley-Burns sales ta � or prop jrty tax � LEGISLATIVE BRIEFINGS ; <br /> which doesn't o into effect until Jul 1, 2004 the ■ <br /> results could have been even worse. LOCAL activism ■ ■ <br /> made a difference • ■ <br /> : November 19 in Ontario ; <br /> Thanks to each city official who responded when ; November 21 in Sacramento ; <br /> we asked for help. To see just how great the re- � To register, go to www.Cacities.orglevents. ; <br /> sponse was, visit the League's website to see a video ■ � <br /> reviewingtheLOCALimpactthisyear. ■■■■■■�■■■■•■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ <br /> PAGE 4/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site-•www.cacities.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.