Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 1-. A -2 <br /> Redwood City staff, with assistance from consultant John Whitcomb and BAWSCA staff, <br /> has spent considerable time analyzing the SFPUC's forecast model and base assumptions <br /> on conservation and, in general, the end forecast results for 2030 appear reasonably <br /> achievable for Redwood City, recognizing that estimates for future purchases from the <br /> SFPUC cannot be exact at this time. Additionally, there are significant unknowns, including <br /> costs for future water, uncertain reliability of the future regional supply, and other <br /> contractual needs and commitments that mayor may not be agreed to when the current <br /> Master Sales Agreement expires in 2010. <br /> Staff has concurred with the estimates for the first two objectives: <br /> 1) Redwood City's total demand projection for 2030, including the plumbing code, is <br /> estimated at 13.40 MGD; and <br /> 2) The potential conservation range of 4.4% to 7.6%, using the mid-point of 0.80 MGD. <br /> Additionally, Redwood City intends to implement a water recycling project, with the goal of <br /> creating a minimum of 1.5 MGD of new water supply. In order for the project to be <br /> constructed the City Council must first: a) adopt a project financing plan; b) adopt water <br /> rate increases to pay for recycled water facilities; c) adopt water pricing policies; and d) <br /> authorize the sale of revenue bonds for the purpose of project financing. Action of these <br /> four items is anticipated by Jan. 2005. <br /> Therefore, staff recommends that for San Francisco's planning purposes, a range of 11.6 <br /> to 12.6 MGD, or 12,969 to 14,107 AF/yr is a reasonable "Best Estimate" for Redwood <br /> City's water needs in 2030. The attached summary provides the basis for calculating the <br /> amount of the estimate. <br /> Alternatives <br /> 1. Submit to San Francisco a higher estimated amount of water for 2030. The City <br /> Council has set a policy of "active" water conservation as delineated in the adopted <br /> UWMP. As such, if there are challenges to the adequacy of conservation efforts <br /> within the service area of the Hetch Hetchy Regional Water System shown in the <br /> SFPUC's PEIR, Council policy and the "Best Estimate" will likely be in conflict. <br /> 2. Submit to San Francisco a lower estimated amount of water for 2030. The <br /> recommended "Best Estimate" could be submitted excluding any recycled water <br /> offset to the demand for drinking water from the Hetch Hetchy Regional Water <br /> System. City Council policy direction for the Recycled Water Project to date has <br /> been affirmative; however, the policy threshold of a "funded, committed project" has <br /> not yet been reached. Until the Council considers - and acts on - a project <br /> financing plan with long-term water pricing and rate increases to pay for it, the <br /> status of the Project could be considered to be in a final planning phase, for the <br /> purpose of San Francisco's planning process ahead. <br /> Fiscal Impact <br /> Submittal of the "Best Estimate" to San Francisco for planning purposes at this time does <br /> not commit Redwood City to any changes in future quantity of water to be purchased <br /> and/or pricing of future water. Therefore, there is no direct, long-term fiscal impact <br /> associated with water purchases as a result of this San Francisco planning effort. <br /> However, if the SFPUC CIP is successfully implemented, wholesale water rates are now <br /> projected to increase from the current rate of $1.13 per unit to $3.19 per unit by 2015, a <br /> 282% increase. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />