My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-06-20
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-06-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 3:05:22 PM
Creation date
6/16/2005 3:16:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
6/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Øl-ð <br /> <br />U.S. SUPREME COURT JUST SAYS 'NO' <br /> <br />On June 6, 2005, the United States Supreme <br />Court handed down its long-awaited decision in <br />Gonzales v. Raich. The Court held that those <br />using marijuana for medicinal purposes could be <br />prosecuted for violating federal drug laws. While <br />expressing sympathy for the two seriously ill <br />California women who brought the lawsuit, the <br />Court found that Congress has the authority to <br />prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana. <br /> <br />California's Compassionate Use Act authorizes <br />limited marijuana use for medicinal purposes. <br />After federal agents seized and destroyed all six of <br />Diane Monson's plants, she and Angel Raich <br />brought an action seeking to prohibit the enforce- <br />ment of the federal Controlled Substances Act to <br />the extent that it interfered with their use of mari- <br />juana under California law. Essentially, they <br />argued that a locally grown product that is used <br />domestically rather than sold on the open market <br />is not subject to federal regulation. <br /> <br />The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with <br />the women, finding that Congress lacked the <br />power to regulate the intrastate, noncommercial <br />cultivation and possession of marijuana pursuant <br />to valid California law. But the Supreme Court <br />disagreed. <br /> <br />In its 6-3 opinion, the Court reiterated that <br />Congress has the power to regulate purely local <br />acljvities that are part of an economic .class of <br />activities" that have a substantial effect on inter- <br />state commerce. Congress may constitutionally <br />regulate the local production of marijuana be- <br />cause such production has a substantial effect on <br />the supply and demand for marijuana in the <br />national market. Because of enforcement difficul- <br />ties in distinguishing between locally grown mari- <br />juana and that grown elsewhere, along with con- <br />cerns about diversion to illicit markets, Congress <br />had a rational basis in believing that local regula- <br />tion was an essential part of the larger regulatory <br />scheme set out in the Controlled Substances Act. <br /> <br />In her dissent, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, <br />joined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist and <br />Justice Clarence Thomas, stated that the Court <br />was overreaching in .making it a federal crime to <br />grow small amounts of marijuana in one's home for <br />one's own medicinal use." Justice Thomas added <br /> <br />that the majority's ruling was SQ broad "the federal <br />government may now regulate quilting bees, <br />clothes drives and potluck suppers throughout the <br />50 states. . <br /> <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />POLLING AND PUBLIC OPINION-A ONE- <br />TO-ONE RELATIONSHIP? <br /> <br />Public officials frequently look to public opin- <br />ion polls as a reliable indicator of public senti- <br />ment. But is it reliable? Under what circum- <br />stances could polls be misleading? <br /> <br />Come find out at the Institute for Local <br />Government's first-ever luncheon symposium at <br />the upcoming League Annual Conference. This <br />year's symposium vvill feature Daniel <br />Yankelovich, a leading interpreter of trends <br />shaping American society. Mr. Yankelovich is the <br />author of 10 books, including Coming to Public <br />Judgment, New Rules, and The Magic of Dia- <br />logue: Transforming Conflict into Cooperation. <br />To learn more about Mr. Yankelovich, check out <br />his interview with Bill Moyers at www.pbs.orgl <br />now/tra n scri ptltranscri pt.Ya nkelovich. html <br /> <br />The symposium will be from 12:30 p.m. to 2 <br />p.m. on Thursday, October 6 at the Moscone <br />Convention Center West in San Francisco. The <br />fee for attending this event is $40, which covers <br />the cost of the lunch. For information about <br />buying a table for eight, go to www.ilsg.orgl <br />symposium. Your attendance also shows your <br />support for the Institute's V\IOrk in service to local <br />officials in the areas of ethics, civic engagement, <br />fiscal stewardship and housing/land use. League <br />alumni (former city officials) are invited as 'Nell! <br /> <br />To sign up, visit www.cacities.org/ac and <br />either check the "ILG Luncheon" box on the <br />regular League annual conference registration <br />form or take advantage of the online registration <br />process. Please note that you do not have to <br />attend the entire conference to attend in this <br />event. <br /> <br />Visit the league's Official Website--www.cacities.org <br /> <br />PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.