My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CCMin 2011-05-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
CCMin 2011-05-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2011 2:45:59 PM
Creation date
7/7/2011 2:45:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
5/23/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Deke Hunter, with Hunter Storm, provided a business profile and their repertoire in <br /> building in Redwood City and other communities (presentation on file). He explained <br /> that his organization has much strength to make this a reality. He asked for a strong <br /> consideration by Council. <br /> One Council Member asked about the issue of housing versus business use. Ms. Ekas <br /> provided information on the pros and cons of each option. One Council Member would <br /> like to go slower rather than faster and she finds this an opportunity to look at what is <br /> out there and find a balance between the need for office space and the need for other <br /> uses. This Council Member inquired about timelines and Mr. Bell explained that an <br /> RFQ (Request For Qualifications) would take about 90 days and staff could come back <br /> towards the end of summer. He added that on the RFP (Request For Proposals) <br /> process under the RDA, it would take longer. <br /> Another Council Member supported the RFQ process and two others concurred. Ms. <br /> Thompson added that the RFQ is more of a conceptual design approach. Another <br /> Council Member noted that this has to be good for the entire downtown. Yet another <br /> Council Member agreed with the RFQ approach. A Council Member asked about the <br /> interest in downtown, and staff commented that there is great, acute interest from the <br /> developer community. Another Council Member agreed with the RFQ process and he <br /> described what he would also include as important elements specifically: financial <br /> capability, conformance with existing rules, and bonus points for housing and <br /> innovation. <br /> Public Comment: <br /> Gita Dev appreciated the Council's discussion and suggested a competition for the RFQ <br /> without guidelines to allow for greater creativity. She opined that there are too many <br /> cars in downtown to make it a truly pedestrian experience. <br /> One Council Member suggested either divorcing the sites or merging them. Mayor Ira <br /> believes time is of the essence and he wants to move quickly with this. He wants to set <br /> up a Council sub - committee with Council Members Gee and Seybert so this does not <br /> linger but gets moved along. Mr. Bell noted that this is a top priority for the City and <br /> Council and it will come back to Council within 90 days. He noted that there was <br /> agreement on doing some clean -up of the City Charter. <br /> Mayor Ira said that the Charter Committee needs to be resurrected to see what other <br /> edits will be placed on the ballot. <br /> Council consensus was to go with option #2 and pursue an RFQ (Request for <br /> Qualifications) process with some Charter clean -up. <br /> C. Receive Report and Provide Direction Regarding Proposed Ballot Measures <br /> Increasing Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and Business License Tax. <br /> (307) <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD May 23, 2011 <br /> MEETING MINUTES PAGE 13 <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 63 <br /> Page No. 331 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.