AgdaPkt 2011-07-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.3.G. - Page 4 EXHIBIT 1 This question requires the approval of a majority of those casting votes. 3. The complete text of the proposed ordinance is attached hereto as Attachment A, and is not to be printed in the voter pamphlet. The full text of the ordinance shall be made available to any voter on request. (Cal. Elections Code §§ 9233 and 9280) 4. The City Clerk is instructed to transmit the Measure to the City Attorney along with a request that an impartial analysis be prepared for inclusion in the Voters' Pamphlet materials. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9280, the City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis, which shall be filed with the City Clerk's office no later than August 29, 2011. Arguments for and against the Measure may be submitted to the City Clerk's office located at 1017 Middlefield, Redwood City, CA 94063, until 5 p.m. on August 19, 2011. Rebuttal arguments will be permitted and must be received in the City Clerk's office by 5:00 pm on August 29, 2011. The City Council adopts the provisions of Elections Code Section 9285 (a), a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment B, regarding rebuttal ballot arguments. If there is any inconsistency between this Resolution and the schedule of the County Clerk for filing the impartial analysis and the arguments, the schedule of the Clerk of San Mateo County controls. 5. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the Election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. 6. Notice of the time and place of holding of the Election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the Election in the time, form, and manner as required by law. 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to do all things necessary and proper to implement the provisions of this Resolution, including certifying the passage and adoption of this Resolution and entering it into the book of original Resolutions. 8. The proposed Ordinance is not subject to CEQA because it is not a "project" pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21065 and Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines; further if the proposed Ordinance were to be found a "project," it is statutorily exempt form CEQA pursuant to Section 15273(a)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, as the purpose of the increase to the Business License Tax is to meet operating expenses. 9. Resolution Number 15128 adopted on June 27, 2011, is hereby rescinded and superseded by this Resolution. ATTY /RESO /RESO.2132 /RC BLT EXHIBIT 1 070111