Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.A. - Page 13 <br />7. STAFF REPORT(S) <br />A. Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Budget Study Sessions <br />Dr. Bell provided an overview of what was in store for tonight for Council consideration <br />(presentation on file). Tonight's presentation will include the Redevelopment Agency, <br />Sewer Fund, Water Fund and the Capital Improvement Program. One Council Member <br />noted that Redwood City was named by the San Jose Mercury as "software city ". Mr. <br />Ponty, Finance Director, then provided a financial overview as well as an analysis of the <br />reserve (presentation on file). He covered general fund revenues, how property taxes <br />are allocated and used as well as General Fund expenditures. He explained that the <br />Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) has been running a little above what is expected and <br />this is good news but he does not expect it to continue to grow. He noted that the big <br />unknown is how the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) will turn out and its implications for <br />Redwood City. He confirmed that the current budget assumptions exclude the Business <br />License and TOT items (which will be on the November ballot). He explained that the <br />goal is to close the gap in FY (Fiscal Year) 13 -14 and if that occurs he believes we will <br />have a sustainable organization. He also noted other areas of concern that may impact <br />the General Fund. <br />Council Discussion <br />Vice Mayor Aguirre inquired about the parking fund, its deficit and when this will be <br />addressed. Mr. Ponty, Finance Director, said that it will depend on Council's actions <br />and he does not foresee that these subsidies will go away. One Council Member would <br />like to get a plan to close the gap. City Manager Bell noted that the two components <br />are price and volume and these need to be looked at. He said that soon the City will <br />have a new set of eyes with the new Community Development Director and he /she can <br />look at this with fresh eyes and do more than just tweak it, which is what has been done <br />in the past. Council inquired about funds coming from citations and Mr. Ponty explained <br />that citations are a different type of revenue but eventually they flow back into the <br />General Fund. This Council Member would like to see the new Community <br />Development Director study a new metering system that might bring us more revenues. <br />Another Council Member supports a vibrant downtown and believes the two measures <br />might lead us in that direction. She believes that this will enhance the value of our <br />downtown properties. <br />Another Council Member inquired about the secured property tax and this Council <br />Member would like a better understanding of the residential versus commercial <br />revenues. Mr. Ponty provided a break down clarifying that 2/3 is attributed to residential <br />and the rest applies to everybody else. This Council Member wants to be able to tell <br />the story and this information is useful. She also mentioned that the reserves could <br />cover an unexpected retirement medical cost. Mr. Bell noted that these discussions <br />need to continue and this Council Member noted that the Council will also be giving <br />back with concessions of their own benefits. She wanted the community to be aware of <br />this fact. One Council Member wanted the Finance Director to double check the figures <br />he provided to the prior Council Member on the issue of the property taxes breakdown. <br />SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING /BUDGET STUDY SESSION I June 20, 2011 <br />MINUTES 4 <br />