My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-09-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-09-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:16:15 PM
Creation date
9/18/2003 3:06:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/22/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9A -i�3 <br />Sept15,2003 <br />Issue #36.2003 <br />LEGISLATIVE RECESSES AFTER FLURRY OF <br />Hot Bills "GUT-AND-AMEND" BILLS <br />ANNUAL CONFERENCE ENHANCES CITIES' INFLUENCE <br />.. Act Now IN SESSION'S FINAL DAYS <br />: <br />■ <br />■ <br />■ <br />■ <br />: <br />■ <br />■ <br />Exhausted legislators officially began their interim recess September 13, <br />when the Assembly finally shut down around 4 a.m. The last days of the <br />The legislature is in session were marked by a return to the bad old days' "gut and amend" ap- <br />Interim Recess. It will proach to legislating. This involves taking a bill that "died" for lack of support, <br />reconvene January 5, or a bill which addressed other approaches, and completely or significantly <br />amending it with new language a few days or even hours before adjournment. <br />2004. <br />The pending gubernatorial recall election seemed to inspire new levels <br />"artistry" in the gut and amend tradition. Interest groups supporting the Gover- <br />nor were determined to put their favorite proposals on the Governor's desk <br />before the October 7 recall, possibly viewing the election as a "last chance" to <br />see their proposals signed into law. While some of these "gut and amend" <br />proposals succeeded, many did not. (How the delay of the election required <br />by the federal appeals court will impact the strategy on signatures remains to <br />be seen.) For more, see page 2. <br />............... <br />A WRAP UP OF KEY ISSUES AND BILLS <br />Want more details on <br />these and other bills? <br />Log on to the League of <br />California Cities Web site <br />at www.caahes.orgl <br />legtracking <br />Below are summaries of the issues and bills discussed in the last days of <br />the legislative session. Those that passed will now go to the Governor's desk <br />for signature or veto. Those with insufficient votes for passage will become <br />"two -year bills" — they can be brought up again next session. <br />Many of the proposals have been reported previously in Priority Focus, <br />through alerts or discussed at the League's recent Annual Conference in <br />Sacramento. For more, see page 2. <br />............... <br />LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES' DELEGATES VOTE UNANIMOUS <br />SUPPORT FOR LOCAL PROTECTION INITIATIVE <br />City delegates to the League of California Cities' annual conference today <br />voted unanimously to support a statewide ballot initiative to require voter <br />approval before state government may divert, confiscate, shift or otherwise <br />take funds traditionally used to finance local services. For more, see page 5. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.