My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
MO 1977 151-277
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minute Orders
>
1970-1979 (Partial)
>
1977
>
MO 1977 151-277
>
MO 1977 151-277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2011 2:29:34 PM
Creation date
8/1/2011 2:29:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minute Order
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/11/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOTION Councilman Barrett moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, <br /> that the following findings be adopted with regard to the appeal of <br /> Harrington-Kulakoff Development Company of the denial by the Plam m �g <br /> Commission of appllcat�on to amend the Zoning Map to rezone a portion <br /> of property ad�acent to Farm Hill Boulevard in the vicinity of Farm <br /> Hill Estates No 1 and No 2 <br /> 1) that with regard to any lack of conformity with the General <br /> Plan which designates the property for employment purposes, <br /> that the alternate development plan proposed by the developer <br /> contains modifications which anticipates the General Plan <br /> zoning for the area, and that, further, the modified pro- <br /> posal also addresses itself to any lack of conformity with <br /> the existing residential use of property in the immediate <br /> vicimty, <br /> 2) that with regard to traffic, the modified proposal would <br /> reduce the increased traffic which might be anticipated by <br /> the initial proposal, <br /> 3) that there is evidence that the specific development pro- <br /> posal for the site can address the matter of protection <br /> of any rare and endangered plant species through use of a <br /> Planned Development Permit, <br /> 4) that economic benefit cannot be measured only by property <br /> tax revenues and direct evidence does not support a finding <br /> that the proposed rezoning will not provide an economic <br /> benefit to the City, and <br /> 5) that there is no excess sewage capacity, but the zoning <br /> is within the capacity of the plar�t as planned for the City <br /> (attachment to <br /> Minute Order 77-229) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.