Laserfiche WebLink
' attachment to M.0 '�-87 <br /> f <br /> 1 The map does not �ully reflect the uitimate proposed sub- <br /> division for t'�e lands involved and there�ore obscures <br /> � the full effec� of the proposed development, <br /> � 2. The site is not physic�alTy suitabie for the proposed den- <br /> sity of development in that (a) the location of the site and <br /> access to the site in combination w�th the density will add <br /> to traffic volumes upon Farm Hill Boulevard to an extent <br /> endangering the public health and safety and (b) the eco- <br /> � logical features of the site will be adversely ar"fected by _ <br /> the commercial features proposed in the development, <br /> 3. The design of the,subdivision and proposed improvements , <br /> are likely to cause substantial environmental damage in - <br /> that (a) unique flora will not sufficien�ly be protected <br /> from the ef`ects of the commerc7al aspects of the proposed <br /> development, (b) the 7ncreased volume of traffic 13kely to <br /> result from the proposed developme�t will adversely afifect <br /> ,the environmen� in a manner detrimental �o lands and popu- <br /> lation in the vicinity of the development and the thorough- <br /> fare prov�ding access thereto, and (c) the commerc2al <br /> aspects of the proposed developrnen� un�ecessar�ly increases <br /> density and �he intensity of zhe use of the land in a manner <br /> ' not compat�ble with surround�ng iands, and <br /> 4 The design of the subdivlslon and the type of improvements <br /> proposed are likely to cause serious public health problems <br /> in that the increased voiume of traffic upon farm Hill <br /> Boulevard iikely to result from the development will create <br /> hazardous conditions �n the vicinity of the property and on <br /> other port�ar�� o� Farm Nill Bouievard which wouid serve as <br /> access to t:�e comruercial aspects of the deveiopment. <br /> ' — — — o <br />