My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
MO 1980 1-150
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minute Orders
>
1980-1989 (partial)
>
1980 (Partial)
>
MO 1980 1-150
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2011 2:43:59 PM
Creation date
8/2/2011 2:43:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minute Order
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/8/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTE ORDER <br /> � �. d <br /> # 80-94 <br /> OI'CICC OF 11IC CLFHI�, RLllWOOD CIT'Y, CALIFORNIA <br /> vaTt: June 24, 1980 <br /> Attent�on City Manager <br /> City Attorney <br /> Assistant City Manager <br /> Building Official <br /> Terranomics Corporation <br /> i�� �i,� nt.�cmr of Appeal of denial by Bui'lding Official of applications <br /> for pro,7ect signs, 202 and 250 Walnut Street - <br /> Terranomics Corporation, San Francisco <br /> At chc mcc[mg of chc Counal of nc� Gty of Rcdwoocl Ciry on <br /> June 23� 1980 , at wh�ch wcre presen[ <br /> t.���,�,c�imc� 6ritschgi, Chandler, Leipng, Rhodes, Stangel and <br /> Mayor Biagi <br /> un mouun of Counulman Leipzig , scconded by <br /> Cuunalm.in $tdi1921 <br /> , duly �arnccl and en[crcd <br /> �,�, �hc u,�����ccs, �c w,�, o�d��ai to uphold the denial of the applications for <br /> proposed sign "B" (more than one sign for the same shopping center and <br /> primarily v�ewed from freeway in violation of Sections 3 101 and 3 129 <br /> of the Code) and proposed sign "C" (located off premises in violation <br /> of Section 3 94) and to direct staff to work with the applicant and <br /> prepare a revocable permit for the directional sign ("C") to be returned <br /> to Council, and that the proposed directional sign is to be smaller <br /> than the 6'6" x 10'5" proposed <br /> c�� c►.eax <br /> :� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.