CC MIN 1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

x75 ,* their desire that the applicant should understand the difference between meeting minimum standards and being granted a planned de- velopment permit, the fact that the appl�cant prepared his own design without professional assistance except for drawings, the fact that Planning Department staff, the Planning Commission and ' the Council cannot and should not act as designers for a develop- ment when their role is to evaluate tt, the fact that a substan- tially improved design could be resubmitted immediately, although a developer must wait one year to resubmit the same application after it has been denied, and the fact that redesign of the pro- posed development could be made The motion carried unan�mously by voice vote The Public Hearing was closed at 8 45 p m. MOTION Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman Leipzig> � to uphold the dec�sion of the Planning Commission and deny the application of John Siekterski for Planned Development Permit on property located at 814 and 816 Palm Avenue, and that the findings of the Planning Commission with regard to the application be con- firmed. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. (MINUTE ORDER NO 78-103) (The City Council recessed from 8 50 to 9 00 p m.) , Report from City's representative on the Solid Waste Advisorv Committee re Ox Mountain disposal s�te (See report of City Manager of April 20, 1978 regarding public or private ownership of the Ox Mountain Sanitary Landfill.) Councilman Bury, the City's representative to the Solid Waste Ad- visory Committee of San Mateo County commented concerning the lack of interest of the County Park and Recreation District in making the sub�ect property a park, stating it is believed there is lack of ,7ustification for public ownership and that it should continue in private ownership with a lease extension MOTION Councilman Bury moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, that the City Council go on record with regard to the Ox Mountain Sanitary Landfill site that it should remain in private ownership but that the lease should be extended at this time. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote (MINUTE ORDER NO 78-104) Consent Calendar In response to request and there being no ob,7ection, Mayor Barrett ' stated that the item relattng to adoption of an ordinance concerning condominiums will be considered separately MOTION. Titles having been read, Councilman Bury introduced the following resolutions and moved, seconded by Councilman Leipzig, adoption of the resolutions and approval of all other items _6_ Reg Mtg. 5/1/78