My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1978
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
CC MIN 1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2011 4:22:28 PM
Creation date
8/2/2011 4:21:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/9/1978
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3'18 <br /> AGENDA (continued) ACTION TAKEN (continued) <br /> PUBIIC HEARINGS (continued) PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br /> 4. (continued) 4 (continued) <br /> Manager and the City Attorney for advice on the <br /> procedure far handling such grievances Mr <br /> Fales reminded him also for the record that in <br /> such a proceeding the accused is entitled to <br /> the same privileges in the hearing as his <br /> accuser who will not be imnune from questioning , <br /> (The Council recessed from 8 40 ta 6 50 p m) <br /> 5 Public Nearing - Appeal of Planning Commis- Mayor Barrett declared open at 8 50 p m <br /> � sion denial of apptication for Variance to Affidavits of Publication of Notice of Hearing <br /> allow seventh dwelling unit on lot which and of Posting were reported on file in the <br /> does not meet certain minimum requirements, office of the City Clerk <br /> 1515 Hess Road - Arthur L Adams, appellant <br /> (continued from 7/17/78 and 8/7/78 at re- In response to question, Planning Director <br /> quest of appellant) Schroeter advised that it is his understanding <br /> that even if the appellant had made applicatian <br /> before the recent change in lot size require- <br /> ments, other variances would have been required <br /> if the property were to be ased as at present ' <br /> �Phili �Aa�ron, 1000 Marshall Street, attarney <br /> represent the appellant, used a slide pre- <br /> sentatton to depict the plot map and filed as <br /> part of the record nine photographs of the <br /> sub,7ect property Mr Aaron commented on the <br /> deficiencies of the property which require <br /> variances and the intention of the owner with <br /> regard to increasing the number of parking <br /> spaces He suggested that no difficulties will <br /> be created if the Variance is granted and urged <br /> Council to do so <br /> Arthur Adams, the appellant, replied to ques- <br /> t ons regar ing parking spaces, noting that the <br /> seventh unit has been occupied by non-driving <br /> tenants since he purchased the property He <br /> advised that there are no ob�ections on file � <br /> from neighbors <br /> Tom Vance, 425 Palomar, unincorporated area, <br /> suggeste3 parking spaces are inadequate for <br /> the sub,ject property <br /> At the request of City Attorney SchrScker that <br /> he list the changes the appellant is willing <br /> to make, Mr Aaron advised that his tlient is <br /> willing to tear down the existing "greenhouse," <br /> . provide three additional parking spaces on that � <br /> site move the existing fence on the lefthand <br /> side of the Droperty, move the electric service <br /> panel so that it does not protrude into the <br /> driveway, and do whatever may De necessary to <br /> make the seventh unit meet present building <br /> code requSrements <br /> City Attorney Schricker stated for the record � <br /> that it appears that all of the information <br /> Spec Mtg <br /> 9/11/78 <br /> page 4 <br /> , ' <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.