Laserfiche WebLink
36� <br /> AGENDA (continued) ACTION TAKEN (continued) <br /> REPORTS Of CITY MANAGER (continued) REPORTS OF CITY MANAGER (continued) <br /> 4(continued) M/S Biagi/Letpzig to approve the proposed <br /> restructure of the Fair Oaks Comnunity Center <br /> Advisory 8oard as described in the Report of <br /> the City Manager of November 13, 1978 <br /> Carried unanimously by voice vote <br /> (MINUTE ORDER NO 78-260) <br /> �-------------------------------'-------------- ---------------------------°-------------------- , <br /> (Council recessed from 8 10 to 8 20 p m) <br /> 5 Financial report re GID No 1-64 for bond <br /> prospectus Financing Plan for General Improvement Distrtct <br /> 1-64 of Bartle Wells Associates 11/17/78 <br /> Letter from Mobil Oil Estates (Redwood) Limited <br /> 11/16/78 <br /> Mayor Barrett advised that in considering the <br /> sub,7ect report that tbe City Council is acting <br /> as the Board of Directors of GID 1-64 <br /> Councilman Norris asked for the record 1) for <br /> an explanatton of the difference between the <br /> original estimate and the present estimate for <br /> the total cost of the nine pro,7ects listed on <br /> page 2 of the Bartle Wells report, 2) whether <br /> there will be any shared financial responsibtlity <br /> for the interim dike (p 3), 3) the estimated <br /> cost to the property owner with regard to the <br /> discount (page 6), and 4) whether the bond <br /> service rate should only decrease or level in <br /> the future ' <br /> Director of Public Works Pusich replied to the <br /> questions and commented concerning details of <br /> the anticipated costs for each of the nlne pro- <br /> ,7ects listed on page 2 of the report, explainTng <br /> the reasons for any expected increases, and <br /> noting that all figures are very conservative <br /> Ra nd K 0'Neil, Bartle Wells Associates, <br /> descri ed t e approach used in preparing the ' <br /> f�nancial report, stating no change is expected <br /> in the bond market within the next six months <br /> which would make it advisable to spiit the bond <br /> , sale, and he recomnended against such sDeculation <br /> Mr 0'Neil advised it ts proposed that if funds <br /> � are not needed, arrangements be made to call <br /> back bonds ' <br /> In response to cortment regarding the posstble <br /> status of homeowners if the developer had to <br /> transfer property to nontaxable status, City <br /> Attorney Schricker pointed out that ther'e is no <br /> prohibition Council can put on a private land- <br /> owner to prevent it, and the matter would have <br /> to be taken into consideration if, and when, <br /> such an event occurred <br /> Lengthy discussion followed and Mr 0'Neil com- <br /> mented and replied to questions concerning de- <br /> tails of his report and the proposed bond sale <br /> Reg Mtg <br /> 11/20/78 <br /> Page 3 <br /> , <br /> V�' <br />