|
, 8 6 �1�` , . - -- -
<br /> Mayar K116urg commen[cd it wau h1e Lopc tha[ tlu Louncils vuuld comc aw ry Crom N�Lc
<br /> i ' mcetLng w1[l� som� kind of an undets[andtng of "whcre do we gn from hcie", whnt do wc do in
<br /> I � ordcr [o vuke Clils a"]oint ciLor[" nnd he undcratundv it will no[ be re9olved thie
<br /> ��� evening, an the membere must [nik to each Councll indlvidually, inquiring if there were
<br /> ' ¢ny suggceHons of wh�C they would 11ke to do
<br /> Councllmm Micl�ael 7❑arret[ .uggosted thlt the group �ccept [he rocommend�HonS of the
<br /> Council of Mayorv with gri[itude Lo the Ci[y Manag�rs' group whlch devcloped [hc viriouw
<br /> � amendments tn conjunction with Che Environmental Hanagemene Plan and alao wieh [li.�nkn [u
<br /> � Bill Flardwick for I�Ss representation He commented Chat in 1972 whe❑ [hcy passed [he
<br /> ;'%;� Federal Water Pollutron (,on[rol Mt amendmen[s, [hey h1d a memo written by onc uC the
<br /> � Environmental Pro[ecuon Agency Negional Uirec[ors stating that che "kederal Water Pollu[ion
<br /> Control Act amendments were shaking [he very fabrics ot American society in changes and
<br /> I they were only talking about Section 201, tha[ they are now on another part of [his '
<br /> I Section 208, and Chere are some areas [ha[ they can agree wi[h, within the Envirommental
<br /> I Management Plan the goal of an employment-oriented General Plan, and they can agree
<br /> I upon eome broad policies tha[ can be overlaid on top of this Environmental Management Plan
<br /> i vith reco�endations from the C1ty and County Managers and, as ABAG delegates, the [hree
<br /> Councils have to vote on thzs He pointed ouc [here should be a clarification of [he
<br /> minimum legal requirements of the Environmental Management Plan as i[ relates Co Section ,
<br /> 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, that being they ought [o be
<br /> I separated ao that they all know what parts are minimum requirements and what parts are
<br /> � policy items, and secondly, all plan implementation recommendations which would fragment
<br /> � r the existing Government Agencies ve have now, should be elimina[ed from the Plan, because
<br /> � ane of the major concerns heard tonight, ia that we ace all afcaid of wha[ this will mean
<br /> ' '* ^' as far as the shake up of government in the Bay Area and [he way it Fvnctions, and with
<br /> these two recommendations he moved that the Councils accept the recommendations of the City
<br /> � and Cwnty Managers 4ssocia[ion with respec[ to [he Environmen[al Management Plan,
<br /> � seconded by Mayor Frank Gonsalves of Belmont
<br /> i Under Qoestlon and as a point of clariHca[ion, Councilman earrett informed the Councils
<br /> that his motion would also include the acceptance of the Council of Mayors recommendations
<br /> in connection with [he deletion of the Land Use portlon of the Plan.
<br /> � Reeponding to an lnqulry from Che audlence, Meyor Leipzig reported that the ac[ion the
<br /> , Cwncil of Mayore did take at their meeting on Fridey evening wae to ¢ccept the City
<br /> � Managere recommendatLone which included che aubetitution oE "P" Se [he policy and [he
<br /> I � gvidelinee for the othere, but the consensus of that group wes thet they would be hnppler
<br /> I Sf the entire Land Use portion wete removed It was her feeling that was the intent of
<br /> I Cwvcilman BarreLt's motion Councilman Barrett concurred that xhat was the intent
<br /> of hSs motion
<br /> i
<br /> Roll call vote on the motion as follows City of San Carlos Councilman De Rosa co�ented
<br /> he d1d not feel it was appropria[e, a[ this time, to take a stand, [hat having heard the
<br /> ; co�oente this evening, perhaps [he metter should go back ro[he Councils in order for each
<br /> � Covncil to discuss [he sub,7ect 1n grea[er depth, that he was not quite sure of the procedure
<br /> but he did agree with the recommendations of the City Managers '
<br /> i l Mayor Lelpzig in[erjected [hat a[ any time before this Plan is adopted by the General
<br /> '� Aesembly� each City has the prerogative of sending in any other changes [hat [hey wiah
<br /> I ^'„a•.:e Councilman De Rosa further co�ented that he did approve of 95% of what he had read
<br /> '' iegatding [his mat[ez and he would vote "Yes" Councilman Law voted "Yes" Councilman
<br /> , Steele voted "Yes." Mayor Kilburg voted "Yes." Councilman Calderhead was absent.
<br /> � Voting on the motion by the City of Belmon[ Councilman Worthge voted "Yes", Councllman
<br /> I Re[cham - abaen[, Councilman HardwSck voted "Yes", Councilman McInerney voted "Yee",
<br /> Neyor Gonealves voted "Yes", who co�mnen[ed tha[ the City Council of Belmont would be
<br /> � having a meeting on Thursday evemng and he would encovrage further input from the citizene
<br /> i and if other reco�endationa are made, they should be forwarded to ABAG
<br /> , Voting on the moCion by the City of Redwaod City Councilman Barrett voted "Yes",
<br /> Councilman Biagi voted "No", Councilman Bury voted "Yes", Councilman Norris was absent,
<br /> , Councilman Rhodes vas absent, Councilman Vega voted "No" and Mayor Leipzig voted "Yes " j
<br /> �I Mayor Pro Tem Jennifer Bigelow of Menlo Park left Che mecting before [he vote was taken �
<br /> i Mayor Gonsalves, on behalf of the CSty of Belmoni, requested the meeting be ad�ourned [o
<br /> Thureday, February 2, 1978, at 7 00 o'clock P M, Belmon[ City Council Chambers. So ordeted
<br /> I
<br /> i 1Lere being no further buainese on hand, [he meeting adjourned at 10 20 o'clock P M
<br /> � Reepectfully eubmitted,
<br /> I
<br /> � Clerk of the Ci[y of San Carloe
<br /> i
<br /> � a}L . � '
<br /> � . - a - ., e
<br /> I
<br /> i Jt Mtg
<br /> ' Belmont
<br /> � Menlo Park
<br /> � San Carlos
<br /> i 1/30/78
<br /> �
<br /> I ,
<br />
|