CC MIIN 1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2 �r8. Public Hearin - Planned Develo ment Permit A lication, 714 Can on Road Stekoll Develo ment Cor oration, a licant) continued from 1�26/76 Mayor Weymouth declared open at 7 40 p m. the public hearing on the sub�ect application Assistant City Manager Smith referred to the Planning Commission ' minutes and the material supplied by staff relating to the sub�ect application. Vice Mayor Williams stated he would abstain from participating in consideration of the sub,7ect application and from voting on the matter Councilman Leipzig stated she would abstain from participating in consideration of the sub�ect application and from voting on the matter. (Vice Mayor Williams and Councilman Leipzig then left their Council chairsat742pm) City Clerk Hildebrand advised that the Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Hearing regarding the sub,7ect application is on file in her office and that a petition from res�dents of the area has been received and copies circulated to Council members Planning Director Schroeter displayed a slide depicting the pro- posed planned development of ten single-family units with condo- minium ownership Mr. Schroeter described the Planning Cormnission considerations in reviewing the application for the development, � observing that the plan now recormnended to Council was approved after several alternate plans had been re�ected. Mr Schroeter called attention to the conditions of approval contained in the Planning Commission recortunendation In response to question, Mr. Schroeter advised that consideration had not been given to a standard develooment of 6,000 sq. ft lots, since no such development had been proposed, that depending upon the divis�on of the land and the exceptions which might be granted, it should be possible to construct seven to ten standard units on the property, that the proposed plan preserves more trees than other proposed plans; and that with regard to access to the property from Canyon Road that three alternatives were considered and the plan recommended appeared to have the most advantages Discussion continued and Mr. Schroeter cortunented and replied to questions concerning the inability of the developer to acquire additional property which would permit access on Glenwood since the easement there is not for sale, the fact that Bain Place is a standard residential street, 54 ft of right-of-way with 34 feet curb to curb; the amount of visitor parking available in addition to the two-car garages per unit, and the City's position wtth regard to maintenance and police patrol of private streets. City Attorney Schricker advised that parking violations apply to ' public parking places and citations cannot be issed on private property, noting that if the foot path proposed for the development -2- Reg.Mtg. 2/2/76