|
116 �
<br /> . P,^-,,,1'F . ?�FC(il°a,T'V�� T'?�l,l°Si. fOT' 2,UtCOT'1tV i,p T2Y:!OV4 i,I'.°.P, ',y"2�S 8.�2,1Y1 e
<br /> considered, City �?ttorney ndcCarth,y sta.ting thzt he could fine no r�;line�
<br /> y �
<br /> ;;rt;ereby the �;roperty ovaner �raa^ liabla for the cost of rernovinP a tree in ''C�
<br /> � �
<br /> the. sideu✓�l'.; or �tre.et, Councilman �ritschgi �noved, Gecond2d by Councilm�n �
<br /> �
<br /> F12tChe.T th3� ?�.�Y'. 11Cv12(a,TV �e 8ii �O remove tl7° tT'A� B,PCl rresent �
<br /> tne bill at the time oi its removal at v�hich time the �,n�ount ma.V - tie �
<br /> transferrer] from the unbud ��t�d reserve, to cover th� arnount,
<br /> �cnlication of T�essr�. Brown and ?�cDonnell £or.permiseicn to erect a service
<br /> eta�ion at El Carnino R�a1 a.nd Lincoln Avemae u;as considered. City Attorney
<br /> renorted th�t he 1.ad failed tr, locat� �,n ordinance requixing furni.shing of '
<br /> sc�.le of dr��a�inGs of �ronosed structure. Councilma.n Anderson r�,oved tha.t �
<br /> �°Tfl11t �bA �?T&,T7�8C1 SLib�°Ct t0 d.11 �DUl.l�lri(�" T°��UlY'C'YIl?T1 aY]d. COriC'l1�lOT1S,
<br /> P3otion secorned 'vv Councilrnaa n?c?�?Z�lty, Gr,.the question, Councilm?n
<br /> 9r.,nstrcng sta�ea th�t 'r�e ielt this ehould be refe.rred to the Flannin� Com-
<br /> miss,ion, a.s in his opinion there should be a lin?it to the nuriioer of ser-
<br /> vice statione a.11ozved on E1 Camino Rea7, Ci�y Atternev ?dcCa.rthy stated e
<br /> tnat in his opinion the Council r;rould hace no discretio� to deny a per-
<br /> ;nit if it is a creditable station, since El C�raino Rea1 is.zoned for
<br /> busines.r, T?otion una.nimously na.ssed.
<br /> Apnlica.�ion vras recei�;ed fro;^� Claude Hoggett, American Advertising Company
<br /> for erection of a., siPri on Ba✓ehore Hi.ahway, usin�; old pole� a.lready in
<br /> place o.� �;18 S1�B, �.OL1riCl.1:".7c.Ci Grang�er �T0�2S�BCt C'TB,YIt2T2� �h2 p2T1177t Ori
<br /> the �round that once a sign is dov,m, the right to er�et �.nother in its
<br /> cln.ce is forfeit�d and t;�e structur.e upon tivhich sign ��:ae rle..ced, Mu�t be �'
<br /> taken down. CounciZman Ar;netion< favor.ed granting the aerrnft because of
<br /> the pr�cedent established in grwr.ting permit to the Chamoerlin Company
<br /> for sign, Councilman Anderson pointed out tY;:t since that wa� a direc-
<br /> tional sign to a.n indt�strial area. in ?edvJOOd Ci�ty, its purpose wwas dif-
<br /> fET'°Ti ITOTtl & DL1P81V �.dti�Tt7.61rir 81�'Yl, SfteT some C11ECi]S810Y1� on :aotion �
<br /> o£ Councilman �letcrier, seconded by Councilman ?RcNu.lty, perrnit i•aas
<br /> denied; on roll call, motion ca.rried, Councilmzr. �rmstrong and Britsehgi o
<br /> votin� in the neg�.tive.
<br /> �n�licatinn ima,s received from Y'. Itertz for permit to construct a ferce on
<br /> La.throp Street �o enclo�e portion of his propertv �nd including sorne
<br /> street £oo�age for storage oi raateriels. Councilman 3ritscrigi rnoti�d, �
<br /> _seconded 'oy Councilman MeTQulty, �hat �natter b� rAierred to City �ngineer
<br /> a:nd Building ICISji°C�O"t ;'T1'i,�] 1??Si,TUCi.1pi1� i0 1�D01'i Oc^,C:_ a� IlE'tii: ?ti?fJoi71E',
<br /> ��07�'.li'1:�i17.Cc1�l0Y'i lYa,S PEc„C i]'O'i] L � i PE, ?� :ar�a.ret Co:mbs Of N�Sc F'?T'T1C�?,.ZE !?8.j*� F`:para,l(�
<br /> I�ake, r�questin� xezoninK of 1st resiciental area in Red=�vood Citv to per-
<br /> (I71� Cllli,ll2'u.l a�Ci,1V1t12E.- aS th1S Y'�qUES� 1+.�2.S fPOYfi o. non resident 170 a
<br /> ac � ion v�ras t<�.ken. .
<br /> �?r, T. H. C1ark anpear�d to protest cortinuznce of P.Qrs, n�ilcired Buhler'�
<br /> dancing scnool on El:vood. Street, nresenting a petition irorn o5 property
<br /> ovrners tl'ie n fiected 2T'8�.� residing on Fu1 �Gri� El�n'OOd 2,.71C1 Breti2�ster, He
<br /> stiated. that.the�e people requested tile Council to enforce the �resent �
<br /> ordinance tn�t �,;nile they d.id not ooiect to dar.cin� or similiar activitie^
<br /> J
<br />
|