|
' 135:
<br /> • Communi.cation ��s received from JGmes F. Waters, Inc, regarding removal of trees ,
<br /> . at 570 E1 Ce.mino Rea.l, Counci.lm•an Britschgi moved, seconde� by Councilma.n
<br /> Fletcher and unanimously carried, that r�atter b2 r�ferred to th� City
<br /> R4anager,
<br /> APtilic�tion for amendment of �rdinance providing for change of easement in the
<br /> ' Ros� Chamberlain, Ltd, property vvas suomitted oy h?r. Chamberlain, City
<br /> 9ttoaney h4cCa.rthy stated that evidently a misunderatar,ciing e��isted be-
<br /> t�;een Mr, Cnamberlain or ?r.r. McDougall, his repreeentive, and ll?r. PRead
<br /> former City Ma,nager, over some of the proyisions of �he 6tn paragra?�h of
<br /> ' ordinance, Furthermore, Tar. ?:4eCarthy vras under the impreasion tha.t.Ross
<br /> Chamberlain, Ltd, Y,as a corporation, whereas he learned. after the ordin�.nce
<br /> was pa.ssed, tha.t the orgar.ization 1��2s a limited pwrtnership, He stated,
<br /> tnerefore, that he had prepared an amendment to the ordina.nce to correct
<br /> the designation of li.censee or grantor of the ea.sernent to nroperly refleci
<br /> , that the name of the li.censee is the R. A. Ch�mberlain, Ltd, nartnership.
<br /> � He stated. further that it na.d been sub.�itted to 34r, Chamberlain, and ne
<br /> no�rr tvished to address trie �ouncil regwrdin� some oi its provisions, Vrhicn
<br /> City Attorney 94cCarthy read to the Council,
<br /> Mr, Chamberl�in stated that ii ordinance was passed as set iorth, it vrould
<br /> cloud title to his property. He thou�ht the drill track should not be
<br /> mentioned because it v:�as not �ermane to the main issue ��hi.ch is getting
<br /> ' the spur track constructed. He expressed doubt �s to v;hether the dri.11
<br /> track �;aas a nublic matter unless the city �sere willing to oroerate and con-
<br /> �truct it.
<br /> �.?ayor Y:ilton stated that in previous discussionL, he under�tooc that the
<br /> City rvas to pa.y half the expense. Mr. Chamberlain said the City apparently
<br /> could not come to a. decision in the matter so he decided to put in the spuT
<br /> track himself. �4ayor Hilton expressed the opinion that �rcpertp Let,yeen
<br /> Bapshore and Bay Road should he nrotected oy hacing the _'acilitiee oi a
<br /> � drill trac'r accesi.ble to it. Mr. Cnamberlain stateo. he cvould have no
<br /> objection to a drill trac�: beino built by the City and vrould enter into
<br /> a gentle�nen'� agreement to t'r�at efi�ct, but�did not v,�nt ti�le te Y;is
<br /> propert� clouded by ha.ving it v��ritten into the ordinance as it appeared notr.
<br /> City A'ttornev r4cCarth�T read paragraph o�:�i�n �ortion objection�ble to ?.4r.
<br /> ' Cham'oerlain deleted. Councilr.nzn Fletcner moced, teconded bv Councilman
<br /> Granger tn�.t ordinunce as a:menaed., and furtl�er amend.ed bs ap�roved, ?Rayor
<br /> Hilton vot?ng in the ne�ative.
<br /> Councilman Fletcher offered a:n.endrnent to Ordina.nce #5N3 in line :�Jith the
<br /> ' abo�e, eeconded b,y Council;nan krrns�rong, and carried un�,r.imously�.
<br /> �ir. Chamberlain statea ttat 7e vvould ltirite � letter to the City of Redtivood
<br /> City, sta.ting t'r,at �ehenever the City .is arilling to ouild the tra.ck, the
<br /> City can anpoint an apnraiser or member of the Council, a.nd 'ne i�vonlct
<br /> apboint another appraiser to condemn the property, and put a valua on it.
<br /> •
<br /> �
<br />
|